Peut-être faites-vous partie des 2,5 millions de Français qui ont participé en direct ou visionné la vidéo de ma candidature à l’élection présidentielle.
Pour que vous puissiez la (re)découvrir plus posément, vous en trouverez ci-dessous le texte intégral.
Je vous en souhaite bonne lecture.
Vive la France !
Éric Zemmour
PS. J’espère vous retrouver ce dimanche. Les inscriptions sont encore ouvertes :
Depuis des années, un même sentiment vous étreint, vous oppresse, vous hante : un sentiment étrange et pénétrant de dépossession. Vous marchez dans les rues de vos villes et vous ne les reconnaissez pas. Vous regardez vos écrans et on vous parle une langue étrange et pour tout dire étrangère. Vous jetez un œil et une oreille aux affiches publicitaires, aux séries télévisées, aux matchs de football, aux films de cinéma, aux spectacles, aux chansons, et aux livres scolaires de vos enfants ; vous prenez des métros, des trains, vous vous rendez dans des gares, dans des aéroports, vous attendez votre fille ou votre fils à la sortie de l’école, vous accompagnez votre mère aux urgences de l’hôpital, vous faites la queue à la poste ou à l’agence pour l’emploi, vous patientez dans un commissariat ou dans un tribunal, et vous avez l’impression de ne plus être dans le pays que vous connaissez.
Vous vous souvenez du pays que vous avez connu dans votre enfance ; vous vous souvenez du pays que vos parents vous ont décrit ; vous vous souvenez du pays que vous retrouvez dans les films ou dans les livres ; le pays de Jeanne d’Arc et de Louis XIV, le pays de Bonaparte et du général de Gaulle ; le pays des chevaliers et des gentes dames ; le pays de Victor Hugo et de Chateaubriand ; le pays de Pascal et de Descartes ; le pays des fables de la Fontaine, des personnages de Molière et des vers de Racine ; le pays de Notre-Dame de Paris et des clochers dans les villages ; le pays de Gavroche et de Cosette ; le pays des barricades et de Versailles ; le pays de Pasteur et de Lavoisier ; le pays de Voltaire et de Rousseau ; de Clémenceau et des poilus de 14 ; de de Gaulle et de Jean Moulin ; le pays de Gabin et de Delon, de Brigitte Bardot et de Belmondo ; de Johnny et d’Aznavour, de Brassens et de Barbara ; des films de Sautet et de Verneuil ; Ce pays à la fois léger et brillant, ce pays à la fois littéraire et scientifique, ce pays tellement intelligent et fantasque ; le pays du Concorde et des centrales nucléaires, qui invente le cinéma et l’automobile ; ce pays que vous cherchez partout avec désespoir, dont vos enfants ont la nostalgie sans même l’avoir connu, ce pays que vous chérissez…et qui est en train de disparaître.
Vous n’avez pas déménagé et pourtant vous avez la sensation de ne plus être chez vous. Vous n’avez pas quitté votre pays mais c’est comme si votre pays vous avait quitté. Vous vous sentez étrangers dans votre propre pays. Vous êtes des exilés de l’intérieur.
Longtemps vous avez cru être le seul à voir, à entendre, à penser, à craindre. Vous avez eu peur de le dire, vous avez eu honte de vos impressions. Longtemps, vous n’avez pas osé dire ce que vous voyiez, et surtout vous n’avez pas osé voir ce que vous voyiez.
Et puis, vous l’avez dit à votre femme, à votre mari, à vos enfants, à votre père, à votre mère, à vos amis, à vos collègues, à vos voisins. Et puis, vous l’avez dit à des inconnus, et vous avez compris que votre sentiment de dépossession était partagé par tous.
La France n’était plus la France et tout le monde s’en était aperçu.
Bien sûr, on vous a méprisé. Les puissants, les élites, les bien-pensants, les journalistes, les politiciens, les universitaires, les sociologues, les syndicalistes, les autorités religieuses, vous disaient que tout cela était un leurre, que tout cela était faux, que tout cela était mal. Mais vous avez compris avec le temps que c’étaient eux qui étaient un leurre, que c’étaient eux qui avaient tout faux – que c’étaient eux qui vous faisaient du mal.
La disparition de notre civilisation n’est pas la seule question qui nous harcèle. L’immigration n’est pas cause de tous nos problèmes, même si elle les aggrave tous.
Bien sûr, vous avez souvent du mal à finir vos fins de mois. Bien sûr, nous devons réindustrialiser la France. Bien sûr, nous devons rééquilibrer notre balance commerciale, réduire notre dette qui grossit, ramener en France nos entreprises qui ont déménagé, redonner du travail à nos chômeurs. Bien sûr nous devons protéger nos trésors technologiques et cesser de les brader aux étrangers. Bien sûr, nous devons permettre à nos petites entreprises de vivre et de grandir, et d’être transmises de génération en génération. Bien sûr, nous devons préserver notre patrimoine architectural, culturel, et naturel.
Bien sûr, nous devons restaurer notre école républicaine, son excellence et son culte du mérite, et cesser de livrer nos enfants aux expériences égalitaristes des pédagogistes et des Docteur Folamour des théories du genre et de l’islamo-gauchisme.
Bien sûr, nous devons reconquérir notre souveraineté, abandonnée aux technocrates et aux juges européens qui ont dépouillé le peuple français de sa capacité à décider de son sort, au nom des chimères d’une Europe qui ne sera jamais une nation.
Oui, nous devons rendre le pouvoir au peuple ! Le reprendre aux minorités qui ne cessent de tyranniser la majorité, et aux juges qui substituent leur férule juridique au gouvernement du peuple par le peuple pour le peuple.
Depuis des décennies, nos gouvernants, de droite comme de gauche, nous ont conduit sur ce chemin funeste du déclin et de la décadence. Droite ou gauche, ils vous ont menti, vous ont dissimulé la gravité de notre déclassement, ils vous ont caché la réalité de notre remplacement.
Vous me connaissez depuis des années. Vous savez ce que je dis, ce que je diagnostique, ce que j’annonce. Je me suis longtemps contenté du rôle de journaliste, d’écrivain, de cassandre, de lanceur d’alerte. Je croyais alors qu’un politicien allait s’emparer du flambeau que je lui transmettais. Je me disais à chacun son métier, à chacun son rôle, à chacun son combat
Je suis revenu de cette illusion.
Comme vous, je n’ai plus confiance.
Comme vous, j’ai décidé de prendre notre destin en main.
J’ai compris qu’aucun politicien n’aurait le courage de sauver le pays du destin tragique qui l’attendait. J’ai compris que tous ces prétendus compétents étaient surtout des impuissants. Que le Président Macron, qui s’était présenté comme un homme neuf, était en vérité la synthèse de ses deux prédécesseurs en pire. Que dans tous les partis, ils se contentaient de réformettes alors que le temps presse.
Il n’est plus temps de réformer la France, mais de la sauver.
J’ai donc décidé de me présenter à l’élection présidentielle.
J’ai donc décidé de solliciter vos suffrages pour devenir votre président de la République. Pour que nos enfants et nos petits-enfants ne connaissent pas la barbarie. Pour que nos filles ne soient pas voilées et que nos fils ne soient pas soumis. Pour que nous puissions leur transmettre la France telle que nous l’avons reçue de nos ancêtres.
Pour que nous puissions encore préserver nos modes de vie, nos traditions, notre langue, nos conversations, nos controverses sur l’Histoire ou la mode, notre goût pour la littérature et la gastronomie.
Pour que les Français restent des Français fiers de leur passé et confiants dans leur avenir. Pour que les Français se sentent de nouveau chez eux et pour que les derniers arrivés s’assimilent à leur culture, s’approprient leur Histoire.
Pour que nous refassions des Français en France et pas des étrangers sur une terre inconnue.
Nous les Français, nous sommes une grande nation, un grand peuple. Notre passé glorieux plaide pour notre avenir. Nos soldats ont conquis l’Europe et le monde. Nos grands écrivains et nos artistes ont suscité l’admiration universelle. Les découvertes de nos scientifiques et les fabrications de nos industriels ont marqué leur époque. Le charme de notre art de vivre fait l’envie et le bonheur de tous ceux qui y goûtent. Nous avons connu d’immenses victoires et nous avons surmonté de cruelles défaites. Depuis mille ans, nous sommes une des puissances qui ont écrit l’histoire du monde. Nous serons dignes de nos ancêtres. Nous ne nous laisserons pas dominer, vassaliser, conquérir, coloniser. Nous ne nous laisserons pas remplacer.
Face à nous, se dressera un monstre froid et déterminé qui cherchera à nous salir. Ils vous diront que vous êtes racistes, ils vous diront que vous êtes animés par des passions tristes, alors que c’est la plus belle des passions qui vous anime, la passion de la France ; ils vous diront le pire sur moi. Mais je tiendrai bon. Les quolibets et les crachats ne m’impressionneront pas. Je ne baisserai jamais la tête, car nous avons une mission à accomplir. Le peuple français était intimidé, tétanisé, endoctriné. Culpabilisé. Mais il relève la tête, il fait tomber les masques, il dissipe les miasmes mensongers, il chasse ses mauvais bergers.
Nous allons continuer la France. Nous allons poursuivre la belle et noble aventure française. Nous allons transmettre le flambeau aux prochaines générations.
Aidez-moi ! Rejoignez-moi ! Dressez-vous ! Nous les Français, nous avons toujours triomphé de tout.
Une nouvelle fois, a la proposition de loi Gaillot a été adoptée par l’Assemblée nationale. Cette nuit, la chambre basse du Parlement a adopté la proposition qui vise à étendre l’avortement jusqu’à 14 semaines. Depuis avril 2020 et le lancement de notre pétition, vous êtes plus de 40 000 à avoir signé notre pétition. Plus récemment, vous avez été près de 500 à avoir appelé des députés de l’Assemblée nationale pour accroître la pression. La proposition de loi a été adoptée en seconde lecture par 79 députés et 36 ont voté contre. Une nouvelle fois, on peut se demander où se trouvaient les députés pour voter un texte si important. Seulement 17 députés les Républicains (ils sont 103 !) ont voté contre. Il est vrai qu’il y avait mieux à faire avec le dernier débat des Républicains hier soir dans le cadre de la primaire pour la désignation d’un candidat à l’élection présidentielle.Il y a tout de même de l’espoir.Le texte va repasser devant le Sénat et il y a de fortes chances que le Sénat rejette une nouvelle fois cette proposition de loi. Nous serons attentif à la suite des débats législatifs. Nous ne nous rendrons pas et nous continuerons à nous battre. Avec vous ! Je vous remercie pour votre mobilisation, Alexandre et toute l’équipe de CitizenGO P.S. — Vous voulez soutenir le travail de CitizenGO ? La communauté CitizenGO travaillera chaque instant, jour après jour et année après année, pour défendre la vie, la famille et la liberté. Et pour ce faire, CitizenGO a besoin de votre soutien continu, maintenant plus qu’hier. Pensez à apporter une contribution régulière à notre mouvement. 5 euros par mois afin que nous continuions le combat pour défendre la dignité humaine et la vie des enfants à naître.
Chers frères et soeurs, ce qui suit est une réflexion sur la révolution qui se répand actuellement dans le monde. Ce sont des éléments de connaissance importants pour comprendre ce qui se passe autour de nous. Comme Jésus l’a dit un jour : « Je vous ai dit cela, pour qu’une fois leur heure venue, vous vous rappeliez ce que je vous ai dit. » [1] Cependant, la connaissance ne remplace pas l’obéissance ; elle ne doit pas se substituer à notre relation avec le Seigneur. Aussi, puisse cette réflexion vous encourager à une plus intense vie de prière, une plus grande fréquentation des Sacrements, davantage d’amour pour vos familles et votre prochain, et à une vie davantage ancrée dans le présent.
Première publication sur ce blog le 18/11/2019. Traduction relue et corrigée le 3/12/2021.
Une Révolution est en cours dans le monde. Mais beaucoup n’en ont pas conscience. On pourrait la comparer à un énorme chêne. Vous ne savez pas qui l’a planté, qui lui donne la croissance, et vous ignorez chacune des étapes de sa vie en tant que jeune arbre. Vous ne le voyez pas davantage continuer à croître, à moins que vous ne vous arrêtiez pour examiner ses branches et les compariez à celles de l’année précédente. Néanmoins, sa présence s’impose à vous à la façon dont il s’élève devant vos yeux, dont ses branches bloquent les rayons du soleil, dont ses feuilles obscurcissent la lumière.
Il en va de même avec la présente Révolution. La façon dont elle est née et la direction qu’elle prend nous sont prophétiquement révélées dans [la Sainte Écriture].
Les arbres de vie
[Dans le Livre d’Ezekiel, au chapitre 47], nous lisons ce passage au sujet du « temple » depuis lequel de l’eau jaillit comme un torrent, apportant la vie à des arbres fruitiers le long de chacune de ses deux rives. « Chaque mois ils porteront des fruits nouveaux, car cette eau vient du sanctuaire. » Nous avons là une très belle description de l’Église qui, à chaque époque, engendre des saints dont « les fruits serviront de nourriture, et les feuilles de remède. »
Mais tandis que ces arbres croissent, d’autres arbres prennent racine : les anti-arbres. Alors que les saints puisent leur vie au torrent de la Sagesse, les anti-arbres la puisent aux eaux saumâtres du sophisme — des raisonnements fallacieux dont la source jaillit du sanctuaire de Satan. Les saints s’abreuvent à la source de la vraie Sagesse, tandis que les anti-saints se nourrissent des mensonges du serpent.
Et ainsi, [dans] le Livre de la Sagesse, nous pouvons lire comment Dieu se laisse découvrir, non seulement dans l’homme lui-même…
… Dieu a créé l’homme pour l’incorruptibilité, il en a fait une image de sa propre nature.
Sg 2: 28
… mais Il se laisse également trouver dans la création :
Car la grandeur et la beauté des créatures font connaître par analogie Celui qui en est le Créateur.
Sg 13: 5
Cependant, le germe de la révolution commence à croître dans le terreau de la rébellion, chez ceux qui ignorent leur conscience et se détournent de l’évidence ; ceux qui, par vanité, suivent leurs propres paralogismes [raisonnements erronés].
… vous n’avez pas jugé avec droiture, ni observé la loi, ni marché selon la volonté de Dieu…
Sg 6: 4
« Ceux qui mettent en lui leur confiance comprendront la vérité. » [2] Car « il y a dans la Sagesse un esprit intelligent, saint, unique… elle traverse et pénètre toute chose en raison de sa pureté. » [3] Ainsi, le germe du Royaume de Dieu est l’obéissance, [et la crainte du Seigneur] le commencement de la Sagesse. [4]
À mesure que ces deux espèces d’arbres croissent côte à côte, tels de l’ivraie parmi le blé, les saints apparaissent de plus en plus comme des « clowns pour le Christ », comme des hommes et des femmes délirants, superficiels et faibles, qui gaspillent leur intelligence et leur potentiel. Le « sage », lui, est plutôt du genre « rationnel », « logique », « scientifique ». Ainsi,
Aux yeux de l’insensé, les justes ont paru mourir ; leur mort a été tenue pour un malheur, et leur voyage loin de nous pour un total anéantissement…
Sg 3: 1-5 (traduction libre depuis l’anglais)
Si le terreau de la révolution est correctement amendé, si les conditions du sol sont favorables, si les racines de la rébellion absorbent la juste quantité de doutes, de divisions, d’insécurités, et d’incertitudes, alors les anti-arbres croîtront suffisamment pour étouffer les « arbres de vie ». C’est-à-dire que l’apostasie commence à se répandre dans l’Église, parmi ces arbres qui ne sont pas solidement enracinés dans le terreau de l’obéissance, mais ont commencé à céder à l’esprit de compromission et de mondanité.
Allons, faisons alliance avec les nations païennes qui nous entourent. En effet, depuis que nous nous sommes séparés d’elles, il nous est arrivé beaucoup de malheurs.
1 M 1: 11
Et c’est bien souvent lorsque les arbres fidèles chutent dans la forêt de l’Église, que le terrain devient propice à une révolution décisive :
… Il sortit d’eux un rejeton impie, Antiochus Epiphane, fils du roi Antiochus… Le roi Antiochus prescrivit à tous les habitants de son royaume de ne faire désormais qu’un seul peuple, et d’abandonner leurs coutumes particulières. Toutes les nations païennes se conformèrent à cet ordre. En Israël, beaucoup suivirent volontiers la religion du roi, offrirent des sacrifices aux idoles, et profanèrent le sabbat.
1 M 1: 10
C’est alors que la révolution se transforme en une réforme radicale, usant de la coercition et de la force pour que tous se conforment au seul « narratif autorisé » et décrété par l’État :
C’est-à-dire la mondanité qui vous mène à une pensée unique et à l’apostasie.Aucune différence n’est autorisée : tous sont égaux… Ce n’est pas la belle mondialisation de l’unité de toutes les nations – chacune avec ses usages, mais unies – mais c’est la mondialisation de l’uniformité hégémonique, c’est la pensée unique. Et cette pensée unique est le fruit de la mondanité.
—
Arrive alors le moment de décision, l’heure d’être passés au crible, le temps de l’épreuve de la foi — de la persécution, l‘apogée de la révolution.
[L’expression « passer au crible »] est une mise en garde : Satan va tester [les chrétiens] pour voir s’ils seront tentés de renier leur foi pour sauver leur vie. Comme pour les grains de blé, ce passage au crible est une épreuve et une sélection afin de garder le bon grain, ceux qui resteront fidèles à Jésus quoi qu’il leur en coûte, et de se séparer du mauvais, ceux qui se détourneront de Lui par manque de courage.
Si l’on découvrait chez quelqu’un un livre de l’Alliance, si quelqu’un se conformait à la Loi [du Seigneur], le décret du roi le faisait mettre à mort. Cependant, beaucoup en Israël résistèrent et eurent le courage de ne manger aucun aliment impur. Ils acceptèrent de mourir pour ne pas être souillés par ce qu’ils mangeaient, et pour ne pas profaner l’Alliance sainte ; et de fait, ils moururent.
Ne le savez-vous pas ? Votre corps est le temple de l’Esprit Saint, lui qui est en vous et que vous avez reçu de Dieu ; vous ne vous appartenez plus à vous-mêmes.
— 1 Co 6: 19 (ajout)
C’est l’heure, non pas pour les saints d’avoir honte, mais d’être glorifiés pour la surabondance de leurs fruits. C’est le moment du témoignage héroïque.
Même si j’évite, pour le moment, le châtiment qui vient des hommes, je n’échapperai pas, vivant ou mort, aux mains du Tout-Puissant. C’est pourquoi, en quittant aujourd’hui la vie avec courage… je laisserai aux jeunes le noble exemple d’une belle mort, volontaire et généreuse, pour [avoir préféré obéir aux] vénérables et saintes lois [de Dieu, plutôt qu’à celles des hommes] … J’endure sous le fouet des douleurs qui font souffrir mon corps ; mais dans mon âme je les supporte avec joie, parce que je crains Dieu. Telle fut la mort de cet homme. Il laissa ainsi, non seulement à la jeunesse mais à l’ensemble de son peuple, un exemple de noblesse et un mémorial de vertu.
2 M 6: 26-31
Je n’obéis pas à l’ordre du roi, mais j’écoute l’ordre de la Loi donnée à nos pères par Moïse. Et toi qui as inventé toutes sortes de mauvais traitements contre les Hébreux, tu n’échapperas pas à la main de Dieu.
2 M 7: 30
Moi, mes fils et mes frères, nous suivrons l’Alliance de nos pères. Que le Ciel nous préserve d’abandonner la Loi et ses préceptes ! Nous n’obéirons pas aux ordres du roi, nous ne dévierons pas de notre religion, ni à droite ni à gauche.
1 M 2: 20-22
La révolution à nos portes
Tout comme très peu perçoivent la croissance d’un chêne immense, peu d’entre nous ont pris conscience de cette Révolution qui trouve son apogée à notre époque — révolution ayant commencé avec la période des Lumières au 16ème siècle — alors même que son ombre projette une terrible obscurité sur le monde entier. C’est à cette époque que le terreau de la colère populaire — colère due à la décadence au sein de l’Église, à la corruption des monarques, à l’iniquité des lois et institutions — fit place au terreau de la révolution. Cela commença avec la semence des sophismes, ces mensonges et notions philosophiques et subversifs qui prirent racine dans un sol fertile. Ces semences de mondanité germèrent et s’épanouirent, d’abord sous la forme de simples paradigmes, tels que le rationalisme, le scientisme et le matérialisme, pour ensuite devenir ces anti-arbres de plus en plus imposants que sont l’athéisme, le marxisme et le communisme, dont les racines étouffèrent l’espace réservé à Dieu et à la religion.
Cependant…
L’humanisme qui exclut Dieu est un humanisme inhumain.
Et ainsi, nous en sommes arrivés au point où les anti-arbres dominent aujourd’hui le monde entier, projetant une ombre d’inhumanité, une culture de mort, à travers chaque continent. L’heure est arrivée pour le mal d’être considéré comme bon, et pour le bien de devenir tout simplement intolérable.
Cette lutte est en corrélation avec le combat apocalyptique décrit dans (Ap 11: 19-12: 1-6). Les luttes de la mort contre la vie : une « culture de mort » cherche à s’imposer à notre désir de vivre et de vivre pleinement… De vastes secteurs de la société ne sont plus capables de discerner ce qui est bien de ce qui est mal, et sont à la merci de ceux qui ont le pouvoir de « créer » l’opinion et de l’imposer aux autres… Le « dragon » (Ap 12: 3), le « prince de ce monde » (Jn 12: 31) et le « père du mensonge » (Jn 8: 44) tente sans relâche d’éradiquer du coeur humain le sens de la gratitude et du respect pour le don extraordinaire, authentique et fondamental de Dieu : la vie humaine elle-même. Aujourd’hui, cette lutte est devenue de plus en plus ouverte.
— Pape Jean Paul II, Homélie au Parc d’État de Cherry Creek, Denver, Colorado, 15 août 1993 ; vatican.va
Le moment arrive ensuite où ces « arbres de vie » seront considérés comme de vulgaires mauvaises herbes qu’il deviendra nécessaire d’arracher et de déraciner, et où les jardins dans lesquels ces arbres auront poussé pour y être cultivés, seront ensemencés d’herbes sauvages, et désertés.
Mais comme nous le rappellent [les Livres de la Sagesse et des Maccabées], le sang des saints devient la semence de l’Église — un triomphe qui commença sur la Croix et que rien ni personne ne pourra arrêter.
Au regard des hommes, ils ont subi un châtiment, mais l’espérance de l’immortalité les comblait. Après de faibles peines, de grands bienfaits les attendent, car Dieu les a mis à l’épreuve et trouvés dignes de lui. Comme l’or au creuset, il les a éprouvés ; comme une offrande parfaite, il les a agréés. Au temps de sa visite, ils resplendiront : comme des étincelles à travers le chaume ils courront. Ils jugeront les nations, ils auront pouvoir sur les peuples, et le Seigneur régnera sur eux pour les siècles…
[1] Jn 16: 4 [2] Première lecture de la messe du 2 novembre 2019 (Sg 3: 9 ; traduction Bible de Jérusalem) [3] Première lecture de la messe du 14 novembre 2019 (Sg 7: 22, 24)
Je plaisante bien sûr… Mais quand une invitation ou une proposition ne semble pas sincère, le mieux c’est de la décliner. Or ici, c’est carrément du foutage de gueule, comme le porte-mensonges du gouvernement nous en sert de façon quasi quotidienne. OD
Avec son « mari »?
Le porte-parole du gouvernement s’est voulu rassurant à quelques jours d’un nouveau conseil de défense sanitaire.
Faut-il craindre de nouvelles restrictions ? Alors qu’un nouveau conseil de défense sanitaire doit se tenir lundi 6 décembre afin de « voir s’il y a lieu de prendre des mesures complémentaires », Gabriel Attal a assuré vendredi que l’exécutif maintenait son cap en misant sur la dose de rappel et la « responsabilité collective » pour freiner la cinquième vague de Covid-19 qualifiée de « préoccupante » par le Premier ministre Jean Castex.
The five U.S. states that have the lowest percentages of their populations fully vaccinated are seeing a fall in COVID case numbers.
According to data from the New York Times, West Virginia, Idaho, Wyoming, Alabama and Mississippi have all seen their average daily cases fall over the last two weeks.
Wyoming and Alabama, both of which are 46% fully vaccinated, saw their case numbers drop by 48% and 41%, respectively. Wyoming now has a daily case average of 144, while Alabama has 300. Wyoming has seen its hospitalizations fall in that time by 22%, but Alabama’s has risen by 1%.
Scientists Find Clues to What Triggers Rare Blood Clots in AstraZeneca COVID Vaccine
Scientists say they have identified clues to what triggered blood clots in rare cases of people who took AstraZeneca’s coronavirus vaccine.
The very rare but sometimes deadly clots led to pauses in the vaccine’s rollout last year in Europe, and had public health experts worried it could fuel hesitancy, even as they stressed that the benefits of the vaccine far outweighed any risks.
The blood clot cases reported after some Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine injections have divided regulators over how and whether to administer them, with France, Britain and Canada limiting use of the shot in younger people, while Denmark and Norway stopped administering it altogether.
Second U.S. Omicron COVID Case Reported, in Minnesota Resident Who Had Traveled to New York City
Minnesota public health authorities confirmed Thursday what appears to be the second U.S. case of the OmicronCOVID variant in a resident who recently returned from New York City, the state’s department of health said.
The man, who was fully vaccinated and has since recovered, traveled to New York City to attend the Anime NYC 2021 convention at the Javits Center from Nov. 19-21, the department said in a statement.
The first Omicron case was confirmed in California by U.S. officials Wednesday in a person who recently returned to San Francisco from a trip to South Africa.
Moderna Says Omicron Booster Could Be Ready by March, But Fauci Says Not to Wait
Moderna President Stephen Hoge said Wednesday COVID-19booster shots targeting the Omicron variant could be ready to present for U.S. authorization by March, though both he and federal infectious disease point man Dr. Anthony Fauci said they believe current vaccines will be effective against the new strain, with Fauci advising the public to get a booster now.
South Africa is seeing an increase in COVID-19 reinfections due to the Omicron variant but symptoms for reinfected patients and those infected after vaccination appear to be mild, a scientist studying the outbreak of the new strain said.
“Previous infection used to protect against Delta but now with Omicron that doesn’t seem to be the case,” said Anne von Gottberg, microbiologist at South Africa’s National Institute for Communicable Diseases.
Von Gottberg said the travel bans imposed by many countries on passengers from South Africa were having a negative impact on the logistics of scientific research into Omicron.
President Biden to Make At-Home Rapid Tests Free in New COVID Plan
President Joe Biden announced a plan Thursday for a winter coronavirus strategy that includes making at-home rapid tests free, extending the mask requirement on public transit and requiring more stringent testing protocols for all international travelers.
The latest plan does not include more aggressive measures like requiring testing for domestic flights or mandating testing for passengers after their arrival in the U.S.
The Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Labor and Treasury Department will put out guidance by Jan. 15 to determine exactly how many tests will be covered and at what frequency, the plan said, and it will not retroactively cover tests already purchased.
COVID: FDA Expert Panel Recommends Authorizing Molnupiravir But Also Voices Concerns
An advisory panel of experts has voted by 13 to 10 to recommend that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration should grant an emergency authorisation to Merck’s molnupiravir (Lagevrio), an antiviral for the outpatient treatment of COVID-19. If the regulator follows the recommendation molnupiravir could be authorised within days.
The FDA has generally followed its panels’ recommendations in the past, but the vote on molnupiravir was unusual for its narrow margin and the many reservations expressed by panellists who voted to recommend the drug. The nine hour meeting was broadcast live on YouTube.
GlaxoSmithKline Says Tests Indicate Antibody Drug Works Against Omicron
Laboratory analysis of the antibody-based COVID-19 therapy GlaxoSmithKline (GSK.L) (GSK) is developing with U.S. partner Vir (VIR.O) has indicated the drug is effective against the new Omicron variant, the British drugmaker said on Thursday.
A GSK statement said that lab tests and a study on hamsters have demonstrated the sotrovimab antibody cocktail works against viruses that were bio-engineered to carry a number of hallmark mutations of the Omicron variant.
Moderna Inc (MRNA.O) could face a patent infringement lawsuit over its COVID-19 vaccine after a federal appeals court on Wednesday rejected its challenge to patents belonging to Arbutus Biopharma Corp (ABUS.O).
Arbutus shares nearly doubled following the ruling, up 95% at $6.25. Moderna shares were off more than 10% at $316.43.
Dutch Say 14 Air Passengers From South Africa With Omicron Were Vaccinated
Dutch health authorities on Thursday said most of the 62 people who tested positive for COVID-19 after arriving on two flights from South Africa last week had been vaccinated, lending weight to a call for pre-flight testing regardless of vaccination status.
In addition, all 14 passengers who were later found to have been infected with the Omicron variant were vaccinated, health officials said on Thursday.
EU Drug Regulator Starts Reviewing New Coronavirus Vaccine
The European Union drug regulator said Thursday it has started a rolling review of a new coronavirus vaccine made by French startup Valneva, the first step toward giving the vaccine the green light to be used in the 27-nation EU.
Approval by the European Medicines Agency would add another vaccine to the EU’s armory against COVID-19 as the bloc ramps up administering booster shots and some countries are preparing to deliver shots of Pfizer’s vaccine to children ages 5 to 11.
Last month, the EU’s executive commission approved a contract with Valneva for member nations to buy almost 27 million doses in 2022. The contract also included the possibility to adapt the vaccine to new variants of the coronavirus and to purchase up to 33 million more doses in 2023.
As Australians Seek Compensation for Vaccine Injuries Under New Plan, Here’s a Look at COVID Vaccine Liability Laws Around the World
More than 10,000 Australians so far requested compensation for COVID vaccine injuries under the country’s vaccine injury compensation scheme. What types of compensation programs exist in other countries?1
Recent reports from Australia indicate more than 10,000 Australians are requesting compensation for vaccine injuries that they received following inoculation with the COVID-19 vaccine.
The claims come as part of an Australian government program allowing individuals to be compensated for lost income after being hospitalized for “rare but significant” side effects resulting from the vaccination.
As originally conceived, compensation through the program was available to people who incurred A$5,000 or more in vaccine injury-related medical costs. However, the government enacted a reduction in the compensation threshold, permitting claims for the cost of vaccine injuries beginning at A$1,000.
The 10,000-plus compensation claims were submitted as almost 79,000 adverse side effects after COVID vaccines were reported to the country’s Therapeutic Goods Administration, as of mid-November.
No-fault vaccine liability: what is it?
Australia’s vaccine injury compensation program is an example of a “no-fault compensation program.”
This refers to a measure put in place by public health authorities, private insurance companies, manufacturers, and/or other stakeholders to compensate individuals harmed by vaccines. Such programs allow a person who has sustained a vaccine injury to be compensated financially, without having to attribute fault or error to a specific manufacturer or individual.
No-fault compensation schemes are one of three options used by various countries to handle vaccine injury claims.
Australia’s no-fault compensation program is fairly new. It was launched in August 2021, despite longstanding calls for the development of such a scheme well before COVID.
A 2020 study found 25 countries with a no-fault program in place, with 15 of these programs administered at the government level.
In some countries, such programs are administered at the provincial level or at multiple levels of government, while two countries (Sweden and Finland) were identified by the study as having no-fault programs fully administered by the insurance sector.
The exact nature of such no-fault schemes, however, can differ significantly from one country to another. As explained in the 2020 study:
In Sweden and Finland, pharmaceutical companies who market their products in these jurisdictions provide insurance contributions which fund those countries’ no-fault programs.
Similarly, Norway’s no-fault program is funded by a special insurance organization known as the Drug Liability Association.
Latvia’s Treatment Risk Fund is funded through contributions from medical institutions, acting as professional indemnity insurance.
In China and South Korea, there are two separate programs, covering those vaccines in each country’s national immunization program (NIP) and those not included in the respective country’s NIP. Each government funds injury claims for NIP vaccines, while pharmaceutical companies or those holding a drug’s market authorization are responsible for funding injury claims regarding non-NIP vaccines.
The U.S. no-fault Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is funded by a flat-rate tax of 75 cents for each disease covered in each vaccine dose.
New Zealand has set up an Accident Compensation Corporation, which acts as a general compensation fund for accidents stemming from vaccinations, and treatment injuries. The program is funded through general tax contributions and levies on employee wages, businesses, vehicle licenses and fuel sales.
Not all no-fault programs compensate for injuries arising from all vaccines. For instance, according to the 2020 study:
Only five (Japan, France, Italy, Hungary, and Slovenia) of the 23 programs specifically examined by the study covered injuries arising from mandatory vaccines or vaccines recommended by law — of particular significance in a world where more and more countries are attempting to implement COVID vaccine mandates.
Just over half (57%) of the programs examined provide compensation for injuries arising from registered and recommended vaccines for children, pregnant women or adults and for special indication, such as occupation or travel, within the jurisdiction. This latter point is also significant in an era where many COVID vaccine mandates are being imposed on specific occupations or as a means of being “allowed” to travel.
Different no-fault programs also have differing rules with regard to when claims can be filed.
Referring again to the 2020 study, in certain countries, claims have to be filed within a certain number of years of vaccination or, in some cases, of the initial onset of vaccine injury symptoms. This ranges from 20 years (Norway), to six years (UK, for adults), to three years (U.S. and several other countries).
In some other countries, the maximum interval varies by province (China), or there is no specific deadline for filing a claim (including Sweden, Germany, New Zealand and Japan for NIP vaccines).
As seen with the example of Australia above, no-fault programs also set compensation thresholds. This is true in all no-fault countries examined by the 2020 study.
Thresholds of eligibility also exist, which may include injuries resulting in financial loss or permanent or significant injury (such as a medical disability), serious health damage or death, severe injuries surpassing normal post-vaccination reactions or other degrees of injury.
Just over half (52%) of the programs studied also provided compensation for claims regarding vaccine defects or immunization errors, while in the remaining countries, these types of claims are covered separately, through civil litigation or medical malpractice indemnity.
The 2020 study also noted that in almost all no-fault jurisdictions, such programs are non-judicial in nature and are instead administrative in scope, typically involving panels of medical experts who review each individual vaccine injury claim.
In a minority of countries, the administrative program is combined with a legal approach and the involvement of legal experts, while in Finland and Sweden, compensation decisions are made based on civil liability (tort) laws.
The standard of proof the claimant is required to demonstrate is generally similar across most no-fault programs, according to the 2020 study. These programs tend to employ a “balance of probabilities” approach that weighs whether it is “more likely than not” that the vaccination led to the injury in question.
This approach takes into consideration such factors as the time interval since vaccination, and existing medical evidence establishing a connection between the vaccine and that type of injury.
A country-by-country look
The above provides a general overview of how no-fault compensation programs work. However, it is also worth examining the specific rules in place in major countries and blocs of nations around the world.
Through this program, any individual claiming a vaccine injury (or a parent or guardian of a child) can file a petition with the U.S.Court of Federal Claims. The petition is reviewed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which makes a preliminary recommendation.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) then prepares a legal report, which includes the medical recommendation, and submits it to the court. The court then appoints a special master, who may convene a hearing, and who decides whether the petitioner should be compensated, and if so, what the level of compensation will be.
This compensation is then disbursed to the petitioner through HHS. Petitioners may also appeal a decision that isn’t in their favor, and by rejecting the decision of the court, may then file a lawsuit in civil court against the vaccine maker and/or the healthcare provider who administered the vaccine.
VICP, however, does not encompass all vaccines. It covers vaccines that are routinely administered to children and to pregnant women, and that are subject to the previously-mentioned 75-cent excise tax.
To date, more than 8,400 VICP claims have been settled, out of more than 24,000 petitions, with a total of $4.6 billion issued in settlements.
Compensation has also been issued. However, most such settlements were reached following negotiations instead of a hearing, with no admission on the part of HHS that vaccines were ultimately responsible for the injuries in question.
A different category of vaccines, including, at present, the existing COVID-19 vaccines, are covered under what is known as the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).
This program was established under the aegis of the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act of 2005. The PREP act was developed to coordinate the response to a “public health emergency.” The law is scheduled to remain in place until 2024.
CICP specifically focuses on countermeasures, that is, “a vaccination, medication, device or other item recommended to diagnose, prevent or treat a declared pandemic, epidemic or security threat.”
Under CICP, a different claims process exists as compared to the VICP. The process for claimants is more cumbersome, and individuals have only one year after the administration of the vaccine to file a claim. Injuries whose symptoms materialize later in life, for instance, would presumably not be covered under this process.
“The program’s parsimonious administrators have compensated under 4% of petitioners to date — and not a single COVID vaccine injury — despite the fact that physicians, families and injured vaccine recipients have reported more than 600,000 COVID vaccine injuries.”
Notably, vaccines with full FDA approval but which are not placed on a vaccination schedule for children or pregnant women are subject to ordinary product liability laws, while vaccines administered under an Emergency Use Authorization are protected from legal liability.
Furthermore, a 2011 Supreme Court decision, Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, held that the Vaccine Act preempts claims made under state-designed defect laws, against vaccines covered by the Act. The decision stated that ““[The Vaccine Act] reflects a sensible choice to leave complex epidemiological judgments about vaccine design to the FDA and the National Vaccine Program rather than juries.”
Until the 1980s, a series of successful lawsuits against vaccine makers was seen as resulting in increasing vaccine hesitancy and declining vaccination rates, as indicated in a 1985 National Research Council publication, released just one year before the passage of the Vaccine Act.
Subscribe to The Defender – It’s Free!
Name*
Email*
Canada:
In recent years, Canada was the only G7 country without a nationwide no-fault vaccine injury compensation program. On a provincial level, Quebec established such a program in 1985, at which time calls for the creation of a national program followed. Attempts were made to develop a national program at this time, which ultimately failed.
As of 2018, Quebec’s program had approved a total of 43 claims, paying $5.49 million (CAD) in compensation.
In June 2021, launched a national vaccine injury compensation program, the Vaccine Injury Support Program. The program covers all provinces except Quebec, whose provincial program will continue to operate.
While this program is funded by Public Health Canada, it is administered by a private company, RCGT Consulting.
The program covers claimants who received a Health Canada-authorized vaccine (on or after Dec. 8, 2020), administered in Canada, with a resulting injury that is serious and permanent or which has resulted in death, and which was reported to the healthcare provider that administered the vaccine.
Though it wasn’t until a few months ago that Canada was able to establish a nationwide vaccine compensation program, COVID vaccine manufacturers were already, as of December 2020, indemnified against claims of vaccine injuries.
United Kingdom:
In the UK, the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) provides compensation totaling £120,000 to anyone who suffers a disability of 60% or more, as a result of their vaccination.
The percentage figure refers to a severe disability resulting in such injuries as the loss of a limb, an amputation, losing 60% or more of normal vision or severe narcolepsy.
Additionally, the 1987 Consumer Protection Act also applies to those who have sustained a vaccine injury, if is found that the product in question did not meet safety standards or was defective. This is further strengthened by the 2005 General Product Safety Regulations.
Consumer protection rights still apply for people injured by the COVID vaccine, as the government wasn’t allowed to take those away. But due to the legal definition of defects, and a rule known as the state-of-the-art defense, it is difficult to get compensation when specific problems with the vaccine are not yet known.
COVID vaccines have been added to the VDPS. However, according to the Human Medicines Regulation of 2012, protection against civil liability is provided to vaccine manufacturers for unlicensed products issued under a temporary use authorization by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency.
This regulation was further amended by the Human Medicines (Coronavirus and Influenza) (Amendment) Regulations 2020, providing extended immunity from civil liability to vaccine makers and those administering vaccinations. However, the consumer protection laws mentioned above still apply.
Legal indemnity has also been directly provided to vaccine manufacturers in the case of the COVID-19 vaccine.
European Union
The UK laws are based largely on EU legislation, which was codified into British law prior to Brexit.
For instance, the UK Human Medicines Regulations of 2012 and 2020 are largely based on their EU equivalent, EU Directive 2001/83/EC relating to medicinal products for human use. This includes protections against civil actions for products released under temporary or emergency authorizations.
The 1987 Consumer Protection Act in the UK is, in turn, equivalent to the EU’s Directive 85/374/ECC of 1985, on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products, while the 2005 General Product Safety Regulations were harmonized with EU Directive 2001/95/EC on general product safety.
At the EU level, immunity for vaccine manufacturers was not standard prior to COVID, when legal responsibility tended to lie with the companies.
This, however, is not the case with the COVID vaccines. Under pressure from Vaccines Europe, a trade organization representing vaccine manufacturers in the EU, and under the guide of “ensuring access” to vaccines, exemptions from liability were granted to companies such as AstraZeneca.
Notably, a question posed in August to the European Parliament by one of its elected representatives, Ivan Vilibor Sinčić of Croatia, regarding liability for COVID-19 vaccine side effects, remains unanswered as of this writing.
Within the EU, different member states have enacted their own legislation with regard to vaccine injury compensation claims. These programs were summarized in a 2021 study examining such policies on a global basis. They can be summarized as follows:
Austria: The Vaccine Damage Act is a public-law system for the payment of compensation for vaccine injuries by the state. COVID vaccines are included in this program.
Belgium: No vaccine compensation legislation exists.
France: The existing vaccine injury compensation program provides relief only for injuries related to mandatory vaccinations. Claims for injuries resulting from non-compulsory vaccinations fall under the general principles of French civil law. For COVID vaccines, claims can be lodged with the National Office for Compensation of Medical Accidents, without having to prove a defect with the vaccine or fault on the part of healthcare providers.
Germany: A flat-rate no-fault compensation program exists for vaccines that are mandatory or that are publicly recommended, including COVID vaccines.
Greece: A no-fault program doesn’t exist, but a May 2021 high court ruling held that those who sustained vaccine injuries are entitled to state compensation.
Italy: A no-fault program providing state compensation for injuries stemming from required or highly recommended vaccines exists, although it is unclear if this extends to COVID vaccines. Claimants are also free to pursue claims under tort law.
Netherlands, Portugal: There is no specific no-fault scheme, but vaccine injury claims can be filed via provisions of the civil code.
Sweden: An insurance fund, Swedish Pharmaceutical Insurance, handles vaccine injury claims out of court. However, new legislation which took effect Dec. 1 will provide additional state compensation for injuries arising from COVID-19 vaccinations.
Israel:
In Israel, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Law was passed in 1989, providing compensation to those injured by vaccines, without having to prove negligence.
New Zealand maintains a no-fault system for accident compensation, including vaccine injuries, under the aegis of the previously-mentioned Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC).
Although most information on claims appears to be classified, financial compensation totaling $1.6 million (NZD) was provided between 2005 and 2019.
The ACC also handles claims related to COVID-19 vaccination.
China:
China’s vaccination program differentiates between mandatory and non-mandatory vaccinations, for the purposes of vaccine injury claims.
The 2019 Law on Vaccine Administration establishes a compensation system for deaths or significant injuries, such as organ or tissue damage, stemming from vaccines. Compensation is paid from the vaccination funds of the country’s provincial governments.
Draft legislation in 2020 called for mandatory liability insurance for vaccine manufacturers distributing vaccines in mainland China. However, it is unclear if this legislation was enacted.
Japan:
Until recently, Japan did not have a specific no-fault compensation program for vaccine injuries. But temporary programs where the government would provide compensation to vaccine makers for legal claims they sustained due to vaccine injuries had previously been passed in 2009, for the H1N1 vaccine, and again in 2011 until 2016.
However, a 2020 amendment to Japan’s Immunization Act now allows the government to take on the liability risks for COVID-19 vaccines.
India:
India has no specific no-fault legislation under the Drugs and Cosmetic Act for injuries stemming from vaccines that are fully licensed by the country’s regulator.
Claimants are, however, able to file claims in consumer courts or in India’s High Court, and the country’s drug regulator can also take action against vaccine manufacturers for violations of the law.
Indian law does provide for compensation in the event of injury or death following participation in clinical trials.
Notably, the Indian government’s negotiations with Pfizer fell through earlier this year when Indian regulators refused to provide it legal protection via indemnity.
Such protection was not provided to the three COVID-19 vaccines which received an emergency use authorization in India: Covishield, Covaxin and Sputnik V.
Adar Poonawalla, the head of the India-based Serum Institute, the world’s largest vaccine manufacturer, had previously called for protection from lawsuits for COVID vaccine injuries.
Malaysia and Singapore:
The country has not developed a no-fault vaccination program, unlike nearby Singapore.
Instead, a variety of legal remedies exist for claimants under civil law, including the Sales of Goods Act of 1957, the Consumer Protection Act of 1999, and the Contracts Act of 1950, and under criminal law, including the Poisons Act of 1952 and the Sale of Drugs Act of 1952.
South Africa:
South Africa is another country that did not develop a no-fault vaccine injury compensation fund until recently, but did so as a result of COVID and, apparently, pressure from vaccine manufacturers.
The fund is meant to provide compensation for “serious adverse responses” which lead to “permanent or significant injury, serious harm to a person’s health, other damage or death,” assuming these injuries were caused by vaccination.
Philippines:
Similar to South Africa, the Philippines only recently set up a no-fault indemnity program, shielding vaccine manufacturers, as well as public officials, from lawsuits, except in instances of gross negligence or willful misconduct.
This same program will also set up a state fund to provide compensation for vaccine injury claims.
Developing world:
Finally, for 92 low- and middle-income countries, the World Health Organization (WHO), along with a private company, Chubb Limited, has begun to administer a no-fault compensation program.
The countries in question are receiving COVID vaccines via the Gavi Alliance’s COVAX Advanced Market Commitment (AMC) program, with vaccine injury claims processed through the WHO’s new program, which is set to remain in effect until June 30, 2022.
No-fault schemes are increasing, but questions remain
With the recent examples of countries such as Canada and Australia, as well as South Africa and the Philippines, developing their own no-fault vaccine injury compensation funds, as well as their further extension to 92 low- and middle-income countries via the WHO, this type of compensation scheme is clearly the predominant method of dealing with financial claims stemming from vaccine injury claims.
As seen in the case of the U.S., such no-fault programs were developed to address claims of increased vaccine hesitancy, as a result of high-profile lawsuits against vaccine makers, and a decline in vaccine production from hesitant pharmaceutical companies which did not want to shoulder the legal and financial risks involved with releasing a new vaccine to the public.
What, however, goes unaddressed in such claims is the vaccine hesitancy, or outright refusals to get vaccinated, as people question why vaccine makers and, in many cases, everyone involved in distributing and administering vaccines, are shielded from legal action.
Such legal shields cast, for some people at least, a net of doubt, calling into question the safety of such vaccines if their manufacturers, distributors, and public health officials involved in their administration feel the need for legal protections. They may wonder why a product that is said to be safe requires such legal shields.
Such doubts further increase when governments and their agencies, which are essentially acting as guarantors of these vaccines through various no-fault schemes, redact critical information about these products, including their ingredients, and claims that releasing such documentation will take several decades, as the FDA did recently regarding its documents related to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine.
This is despite the fact that in the 2011 Bruesewitz v. Wyeth decision, the U.S. Supreme Court gave considerable latitude to the FDA for, essentially, knowing better than judges and juries, or state lawmakers, how to regulate vaccines.
Despite this legal shielding, plenty of coverage of adverse reactions, and even deaths, following vaccinations is making its way into the media, and to the public consciousness, seemingly negating yet another argument in favor of indemnity.
Furthermore, as many no-fault schemes place the burden on taxpayers and government coffers, these financial costs are ultimately borne by the public.
Arguments that claim shielding vaccine makers from lawsuits also helps to keep the cost of these products down can be called into question on such grounds, especially if the government is the one making deals with vaccine manufacturers and paying for these vaccines.
Costs may be reduced in their purchase price, but the same government and same funds are then used to settle vaccine injury claims.
Such claims from vaccine makers, such as Pfizer for instance, also appear to be disingenuous when considering their high marketing budgets, which in the U.S., far exceed their research and innovation expenditures.
Arguments can be made that such funding could be redirected towards legal claims, towards reducing vaccine and drug prices, or both.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.
Media Stirs Up Omicron Hysteria, Points Finger at Unvaccinated
No sooner had the Omicron hysteria hit the headlines, politicians, aided by a compliant global lockstep media, started identifying scapegoats and telling the world’s population to prepare to roll up their sleeves.7
Lockstep political decision to roll out leaky “vaccines” occurred around the world immediately following the Omicronannouncement.
Circumstances with a new, heavily mutated variant, vastly different population immunity and knowledge about “genetic vaccine” effectiveness, nothing like those 12 months ago when first generation COVID injections were rolled out globally.
Omicron may be more infective, is likely no more dangerous — but may be more likely to evade injection-induced immunity.
There is no conclusive evidence that Omicron originated in Africa — which happens to have the lowest injection rate and case rate of COVID-19.
Mass injection of first gen injections, followed by re-worked Omicron-specific jabs, could cause disastrous consequences, including accelerating development of further variants and antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease.
We consider some of the possible political and economic drivers behind the new unscientifically backed policy to up the ante on injections.
No sooner had the Omicron hysteria hit the headlines, politicians, aided by a compliant global lockstep media, started telling the world’s population to prepare to roll up their sleeves.
What’s more, three scapegoats have been identified: the unvaccinated, HIV patients and the least vaccinated continent on the planet: Africa.
For many in the industrialized world, there is a sense of déjà vu from this time last year — but with a twist.
Last year the population had been primed to expect almost impossibly high levels of protection from infection based on the results of phase 3 clinical trials. Only recently have these trials been brought into question.
Last year, the majority had also bought the line that these new generation “genetic vaccines” would stop transmission and yield herd immunity. The head of the Oxford Vaccine Group, Prof. Andrew Pollard, subsequently told the world that possibility is now “mythical.”
Knowing what they knew then, people flocked to the vaccination centers as the promise being offered was a return to normal life. Only time would tell how misplaced that view was.
The indisputable reality is that the COVID-19 injections are “leaky.” The spike-targeting neutralizing IgG antibodies they so readily elicit just don’t neutralize (block) very well so they can’t stop infection or subsequent transmission.
What drives the creation of immune escape variants?
Perceptions among politicians, the public and even scientists as to the main drivers of mutations that can escape the effects of the immune system, whether from naturally-acquired infection or the response generated by injections, differ wildly.
Smack in the middle of this lack of consensus comes Omicron, and a high chance that policies based on one line of thinking will be viewed as counterproductive or even potentially disastrous and life threatening by others.
We’ve reported on the underlying science at length before, and supported the evolutionary arguments elaborated in the public domain by Belgian vaccinologist, Geert Vanden Bossche, VDM, Ph.D., David Lorimer, program director of the Scientific and Medical Network and I have, this week, released a short article that attempts to summarize in layperson’s language the central tenets of Vanden Bossche’s thesis.
The opposing arguments ignore entirely evolutionary pressure and focus on the unvaccinated and the immune compromised as the reservoirs that provide more opportunities to breed mutants.
The logic — at face value — seems reasonable. If the virus is able to replicate more often in people who suffer COVID-19 disease for longer, and people who can’t effectively neutralize the virus, the increased replication increases the probability of mutants emerging.
More rolls of the dice, if you like. The trouble is that this argument is fundamentally flawed for a number of reasons.
We’ve seen previous mutants by and large being generated under high vaccination pressures, with increases in cases being associated with expanding “vaccine” coverage.
Also, clear evidence that the vaccines are increasingly unable to neutralize the virus, especially more recently emerging variants, so being unable to stop transmission while also waning in effectiveness within a few months post-jab.
What’s more, they also interfere with innate immune training which is our primary defence against different variants of this (and other) pathogens and our only means of developing herd immunity given the “leakiness” of the current “genetic vaccines.”
Omicron focus
In a sea of immense uncertainty, one thing that is more or less certain, now that the initial errors in the claimed mutations were corrected, is the 32 spike protein mutations of Omicron.
But it’s not just the, comparatively speaking, high number of significant mutations in the spike protein (Table 1), it’s their potential impacts on both the virus and the human immune systems with which the virus interacts that are key.
It’s of course too early to know exactly what effects these mutations will have on the very diverse and varied populations of humans, and potentially other species if spill-over continues.
Table 1. SARS-CoV-2 “Variants of concern”
Main data sources: WHO and GISAID. *Note that the WHO has not claimed either Botswana or South Africa as countries of first documentation — see discussion below. † Based on media reports by Dr. Anthony Fauci
The limited information available from the small numbers of cases that have been reported so far is that disease severity (i.e., deadliness) is not significantly greater than with delta.
It’s too early to say if Omicron will out-compete delta as this depends on many factors, such as the ability or otherwise of Omicron to evade innate and/or adaptive immunity in populations with different immune backgrounds (generated by COVID injections and naturally-acquired infection), and latency prior to high viral loads being generated.
Early reports, such as those by South African, Dr. Angelique Coetzee, who first spotted the new symptoms of Omicron-mediated COVID-19 were that the severity of disease wasn’t worse than delta. It’s likely though that the pattern of symptoms will be different.
Younger people may also be more vulnerable, especially if their trained innate immunity is damaged by injections. This view is of course not wholly in line with that of the WHO that stated the following on Nov. 28:
“There is currently no information to suggest that symptoms associated with Omicron are different from those from other variants. Initial reported infections were among university students—younger individuals who tend to have more mild disease — but understanding the level of severity of the Omicron variant will take days to several weeks.”
Many independent experts have opined that transmission might be higher based on the configuration of the mutations and if that’s the case and latency isn’t extended significantly over delta — Omicron may readily replace delta as the dominant variant in most countries.
While it will likely be days or weeks before Omicron’s potential virulence and transmissibility can be better appreciated, the configuration of mutations — highly conserved within the spike protein itself — tells us that there’s a high likelihood that existing injections will be even less effective than on delta.
This view is confirmed by none other than Dr. Anthony Fauci, as well as others, such as Dr. Samiran Panda who heads the Epidemiology and Communicable Diseases Division of the Indian Council of Medical Research.
The pace at which the new variant has been used by politicians to push first-generation injections on the public, along with everything else we know about the host-pathogen-injection interaction, is breathtaking given the uncertainties involved with this policy.
They know, for example, these injections were designed to elicit antibodies that are highly specific to the original Wuhan strain’s spike protein and they also know the configuration differs substantially to that of the Omicron variant.
While the public is being told they should boost their immune system with the existing injections, they’re not being told that there could be grave costs to this, like damaging innate immunity, inducing more severe reactions to disease, enhancing transmission or exposing countless people to unnecessary, potentially debilitating or life-threatening adverse reactions.
Pfizer has already announced it’s working on making new injections built specifically for Omicron and these might be 100 days away. The immediate decision to foist the old injections on the public to “boost” immunity with what are probably even more weakly neutralizing antibodies at best is clearly based on political or economic, not medical, expedience.
Where did Omicron come from?
The world’s media is typically claiming Botswana or South Africa as the country in which Omicron was first detected. It is true that the largest numbers of cases have been found there, as evidenced by the country submission count on the GISAID variant tracker, as seen in Table 2.
Table 2. Most recent reported occurrences of Omicron variant in different countries.
Source: GISAID. Downloaded Dec. 2021.
But it’s also clear, from the GISAID records, that neither Botswana nor South Africa were the countries in which the earliest detection of Omicron (variant B.1.1.529) occurred.
Collections in Sweden, Israel, Reunion and the UK all appear to precede those from Botswana and South Africa. Check out the table from GISAID below, which is in reverse chronological order.
Table 3. Country submission count to GISAID as of Dec. 1, 2021
Source: GISAID. Downloaded Dec. 1, 2021.
Today we hear that a sample collected in October in Nigeria from an “incoming international traveller” was positive for Omicron.
No doubt a lot more will be revealed in time. For us, currently available information means the jury is absolutely out as to whether Omicron originated in Africa at all.
The origins might well have been a traveler from a highly vaccinated country that imported it to Africa. Dr. Masupu of the Presidential COVID-19 Task Force of the Botswana Government confirmed that the four university students known by the task force to be infected with Omicron were all fully vaccinated.
We also know that blaming Omicron on Africa makes sense if there is to be mounting pressure to vaccinate the world’s least vaccinated continent, that also has by far the fewest issues with COVID-19 (see Fig. 1). Much of Africa — it seems — doesn’t want to play ball.
Figure 1. Daily new confirmed COVID-19 cases and deaths per million people in 3 continents: Africa, Europe and North America.
Source: Our World in Data
What we also know is just after South Africa announced it didn’t want to accept more COVID injections from Pfizer or Johnson & Johnson, the Omicron alarm bell was sounded. Coincidence?
Possible consequences of using boosters in an Omicron wave
What we have witnessed since early 2021 when COVID jabs were rolled out across the industrialized world is a gradual loss of synchronicity in the injection efforts.
Different countries had different uptakes, the speed of roll out across successively younger age groups, hesitancy and refusal varied country to country and sometimes even region to region.
All of that loss of synchronicity actually reduces selection pressure — as does having big reservoirs of unvaccinated young people with lively innate immune systems, like in much of the African continent.
Omicron will re-synchronize the injection campaigns. Vast numbers of people will get a top up of the first generation jab, only to be hit yet again when the “must-have” Omicron-specific jab rolls off the production line probably in under 4 months.
More synchronization means that more intense selection pressure will be applied to the spike protein of Omicron, and more replication will occur as the antibodies generated by the injections will not effectively block infection.
This creates the vicious circle that Vanden Bossche has described that we have been caught in already for a year with ever greater risk of more dangerous and more infective mutants being generated.
Higher frequency of exposure also means more insults to the immune system and that means more damage to the innate immunity of our species — our primary weapon against a mutating pathogen.
The conditions are set for escalating risks of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease when injected people are exposed to disease, as well as an ever greater toll of adverse events and deaths mediated by autoimmunity, inflammation, neurological and cardiac issues.
The consequences of a bad outcome for humanity are scarcely worth considering — and it seems that’s why the politicians, ushered along by a vaccine/biotech/pharma industry with an insatiable appetite for maximizing profitability while avoiding any liability for any damages caused — are going with it.
Just as the earlier unscientifically-based decisions to lockdown, mask up and socially isolate populations at the beginning of this pandemic was an ominous signal of the authoritarianism and suppression that was to come, Omicron’s arrival is just as ominous.
It is the reaction of governments, health authorities, politicians and business leaders who seem hell bent on continuing this failing, ever more risky endeavor of installing synthetic instructions into our bodies, the consequences of which will not be well known to the public for some years.
Bear in mind that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration asked a federal judge to make the American public wait until 2076 (yes, 55 years!) before all of the data on Pfizer’s “genetic vaccine” it relied on for approvals are made public.
The great news is the judge has just forced Pfizer to release the documents incrementally — the first lot being something of a revelation in terms of the adverse event profile. More on that next week.
Without our trust, one wonders if “they” are beginning to understand why so many of us around the world are conscientious objectors?
Very worrying vaccine data on heart attacks – Week 48, 2021
Herland Report Newsletter
Herland Report Newsletter, Week 48, 2021 The Herland Report news and opinion website provides independent analysis from leading Western intellectuals and YouTube interviews, cutting through the media rhetoric. The level of censorship in social media and search engines is all-time high. Recommend others to subscribe to our newsletter here!Spike Protein mRNA vaccines Increase Heart Attacks and Negatively effects the Immune System Herland Report: Spike Protein mRNA vaccines Increase Heart Attacks: “We conclude that the mRNA vaccines dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium (layer of cells lining the blood vessels) and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis (clotting), cardiomyopathy, (a group of diseases that affect the heart muscle) and other vascular events following vaccination.” …
Read moreThe Lancet reports Sharply rising Covid among Vaccinated Herland Report: Sharply rising Covid rates among the Vaccinated: A recent report by The Lancet concludes that the mass vaccination process world wide has failed in halting the Covid transmissions. New data shows that the virus is increasing in fully vaccinated individuals: « This proportion is increasing week by week and was 58.9% on 27. October 2021 (Figure 1) providing clear …
Read moreThe Age of Western Stagnation: Greed and Lack of Trust Herland Report: Western stagnation: We live in an age of remarkable Western stagnation. Respect for traditional values such as honesty, trustworthiness and self-restraint have been killed off by the Marxist rebellion against morality. Greed and selfishness are now forefront values. It may be argued that the deterioration of traditional ethics is precisely the element that contributes to economic decline that …
Read moreThe tyranny of the Left: Zero respect for Christianity and its impact on Western Civilization Herland Report: The tyranny of the Left: As we live in an age of atheist intolerance, where the elitist mainstream media constantly focus negatively on Christians, we need to remember how ground breaking the Christian faith really is, writes Hanne Herland in The Christian Post. So, let’s talk about the massive impact Christianity and the revolutionary message of Jesus …
Read moreDisintegration and the Collapse of America Herland Report: The Collapse of America: Andrei Martyanov’s book Disintegration: Indicators of the Coming American Collapse“ is well worth reading. It took Russia twenty years to return to being a normal state with a vibrant economy, powerful armed forces and self-respect, but Russians still had a nation, even in those horrifying times of the 1990s so-called “liberal” experiment. “The United …
Read moreDisintegration: Indicators of the Coming American Collapse – Andrei Martyanov Herland Report: The Coming American Collapse: Andrei Martyanov’s book on imperial decline features a devastating indictment of US political mediocrity, writes Pepe Escobar about Disintegration: Indicators of the Coming American Collapse: « His new book, Disintegration, completes a trilogy and in the process represents a stunning departure. Here Martyanov, in meticulous detail, analyzes the imperial decline thematically. Chapters on consumption, geoeconomics, …
Read moreRobert Kennedy Jr. on The Real Anthony Fauci: He Serves only Big Pharma Herland Report: The Real Anthony Fauci: Robert Kennedy Jr. recently spoke about his book, The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, on the Theo Von podcast, sharply criticizing Dr. Fauci for being a servant to Big Pharma. Kennedy’s new book is #1 on Amazon, and a New York Times and …
Read moreCovid Fascism: The road Paved with Vaccine Mandates and Corporate Collusion Herland Report: Covid Fascism: “Man is born free but everywhere is in chains.”—Jean-Jacques Rousseau We are moving fast down the road to fascism. This COVID-19 pandemic has shifted us into high gear. The heavy-handed collusion between the Techno-Corporate State and the U.S. government over vaccine mandates is merely the latest manifestation of the extent to which fascist forces are working to …
Read moreJesus lived in a police state, much like America today Herland Report: Jesus was born into a police state not unlike the growing menace of the American police state. When he grew up, he had powerful, profound things to say—things that would change how we view people, alter government policies and change the world. “Blessed are the merciful,” “Blessed are the peacemakers,” and “Love your enemies” are just a …
Read moreCovid-19 vaccines cause dramatic rise in new infections and mortality, says WHO statistics Herland Report: Covid-19 vaccines cause dramatic rise: The Gérard Delépine article is worth revisiting as it demonstrated that mortality and morbidity has increased dramatically as a result of the Covid-19 vaccine in many nations. Covid positive cases have also increased. The trend has been followed by a dramatic rise in new infections and mortality for several weeks or months. The …
Read moreRemember Dr. Neil Ferguson who predicted 65 million Covid deaths? Herland Report: Dr. Neil Ferguson, the man behind the Imperial College Report, which showed that millions would die from Covid-19, was central in shifting the UK and US from the herd immunity strategy to society lockdown. The report later turned out to be fraudulent, was never published scientifically, not even peer-reviewed and appeared more as a draft. And Ferguson was …
Read moreDr. Roger Hodkinson: Why suppress discussing Covid vaccines may produce sterilization, heart failure? Herland Report: It is worth revisiting Dr. Roger Hodkinson’s interview with former BBC reporter, Anna Brees about what he deems as the grave dangers connected to the current not properly tested Covid vaccines. In question is the body’s reaction to the spike protein introduced by the current vaccines that may produce sterilization, heart failure and the much spoken of blood …
Read moreBayer President admits mRNA Vaccines are Cell and Gene Therapy Public Takes due to Pandemic Coercion Herland Report: Bayer President and mRNA Vaccines: Bayer Pharmaceuticals President Admits mRNA “Vaccines” Are Cell and Gene Therapy and The Public Would Not Have Agreed to Take Them If It Were Not for the “Pandemic.” At this year’s World Health Summit Stefan Oelrich, President of Bayer’s Pharmaceuticals Division, gave a truly eye-opening speech revealing how the so-called “experts” think and …
Read moreTV interview: Dr. Brenda Caldwell Dr.B talks about Drug Epidemic and its remedy Brenda Caldwell Dr.B about Drug Epidemic: Herland Report TV host, Hanne Herland speaks to Dr. Brenda Caldwell, Dr.B about the Drug Epidemic, pain and suffering in America, and the way out. Dr. Brenda Caldwell, « Dr. B » is a psychologist, an acclaimed empowerment speaker who travels the nation, an acclaimed artist and author with books such as “From Charcoal to …
Read moreBlackRock Unregulated Investment Firm now Rules the World Herland Report: BlackRock Unregulated Investment Firm: A virtually unregulated investment firm today exercises more political and financial influence than the Federal Reserve and most governments on this planet. The firm, BlackRock Inc., the world’s largest asset manager, invests a staggering $9 trillion in client funds worldwide, a sum more than double the annual GDP of the Federal Republic of Germany. …
Read moreFDA wants to keep Pfizer COVID vaccine clinical trials data secret until 2076 Herland Report: Pfizer COVID vaccine clinical trials: In a request that couldn’t be any more bizarre, the FDA has asked a federal judge for permission to hold off releasing data on Pfizer’s COVID vaccine clinical trials until 2076. What kind of transparency is that? asks Aaron Siri in his blog, “Injecting Freedom.” The fed gov’t shields Pfizer from liability. Gives …
Read moreVaccines do Not Stop Covid, Why? Read WHO data Below Herland Report: Vaccines do not stop Covid: For more than 18 months, our governments and the media have been telling us: “The return to normal life will be possible thanks to the vaccine,” “you will regain your freedom when you are vaccinated, » “the non-vaccinated are responsible for the continuation of the epidemic.” But no real-world study has provided the slightest …
Read moreSucharit Bhakdi: Covid-19 vaccination is greatest threat humanity ever faced Herland Report: Covid-19 vaccination is greatest threat humanity ever faced: Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, forefront virus expert in microbiology in Germany, is one of the many doctors, scientists and medical professionals who give dire warnings about the current untested vaccines that are being administered to billions in the world. Dr. Bhakdi is one of the most cited research scientists in German …
Read moreCensorship exists to prevent intellectuals from challenging existing institutions Herland Report: Censorship is a hydra that rears a beastly new head in every era. For “corrupting the minds of the youth of Athens,” Socrates, Western philosophy’s founding moral philosopher, was sentenced to death. The unthinkable crime of translating the Bible into English was punishable by excommunication in Medieval Europe – John Wycliffe escaped by the skin of his teeth. …
The Herland Report believes in freedom of speech and its editorial policy resides above the traditional Left vs Right paradigm which we believe has lost its relevance and ability to describe the current driving forces in Western politics. Articles are to be used as pieces of information that should be considered when seeking to acquire a full overview regarding a specific subject. We do not take responsibility for mistakes, omissions or other flaws in articles published by our variety of authors or TV show guests. For more information: http://hannenabintuherland.com/herland-report-
Home»Corona Scandal»Remember Dr. Neil Ferguson who predicted 65 million Covid deaths?
Remember Dr. Neil Ferguson who predicted 65 million Covid deaths?
1 week ago
Herland Report: Dr. Neil Ferguson, the man behind the Imperial College Report, which showed that millions would die from Covid-19, was central in shifting the UK and US from the herd immunity strategy to society lockdown.
The report later turned out to be fraudulent, was never published scientifically, not even peer-reviewed and appeared more as a draft. And Ferguson was sacked from his job due to improper conduct meetings with married lover during lockdown, so he is already out.
The main point being that it was the WHO that painted the massive scare scenario in March, 2020 together with Dr. Neil Ferguson’s Imperial Report.
Jointly they created the mass fear scenario in which up to 65 millions were expected to be killed by Covid-19.
The Imperial report predicted that 510,000 could die in the UK without lockdown, while 250 000 could die even with a isolationist strategy. The report is said to have made UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson change his mind from herd immunity to rapidly implementing society lockdown in the UK – still in effect today, 15 months later.
“The Imperial Report was never even published scientifically; it’s not peer-reviewed, which a scientific paper should be; it’s just an internal departmental report from Imperial. And it’s fascinating; I don’t think any other scientific endeavor has made such an impression on the world as that rather debatable paper,” said Johan Giesecke, the Swedish professor who was the State Epidemiologist for Sweden between 1995 to 2005 and former Chief Scientist of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).
Dr. Mathew Maavak, a Malaysian expert on risk foresight and governance, recently commented: “Up to 65 million people were projected to die from this contagion. Unsurprisingly, a common denominator between both projections was the omnipresent Microsoft, which helped ‘tidy up’ Dr. Neil Ferguson code. Experts and politicians the world over naturally “listened to the science,” mirroring a teenager’s hysterics over another supposedly existential issue.
Now, however, shadow-banned links are emerging from Google’s search limbo to inform us that Dr. Neil Ferguson’s code was in fact a “buggy mess” that looked “more like a bowl of angel hair pasta than a finely tuned piece of programming,” according to one data expert. This is what our endless lockdowns and coercive vaccination programs were based on.” End quote.
Dr. Neil Ferguson has been notorious in the past for overestimating numbers. He was involved in doing so during Ebola and the Swine epidemic. He also said that 150 000 people would die during Foot and Mouth outbreak. In the end, 200 people died.
The Culture War. How the West lost its greatness is a forceful attack on the Liberal ideology that have permeated our culture and weakened its very core. The West is now characterized by strict, elitist media censorship, hedonism, a culture of drug abuse, abortion, ethnic clashes and racial divide, a destructive feminism and the dramatic break-down of the family. The book outlines the remedy for the current malaise.
In the March 10 meeting with EU leaders, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization estimated 3.5 % or more death rates among those who contracted the virus. Tedros said that there were 118,000 cases in 114 countries, and 4,291 killed from the virus, describing the outbreak as “pandemic.”
If the death rate is 3.5 %, it would mean millions dead from Covid-19. If the death rate is 0.3 %, on the other hand, such as predicted by Rystad Energies, the extreme measures imply a dramatic over reaction.
Tedros is famous for calling Bill Gates his “brother,” the famous Western oligarch billionaire turned “world pandemic expert” with particular interest in world vaccines and controlling public health. His malfunctioning polio vaccine caused 500 000 children to be paralyzed in India, according to Robert Kennedy.
Dr. Mathew Maavak, a Malaysian expert on risk foresight and governance recently reminded us all about Dr. Neil Ferguson, the British epidemiologist who estimated that up to 65 million were to die from Covid-19. This was back in spring, 2020 and contributed to the United Kingdom scrapping herd immunity, implementing the hardcore lockdown that has lasted up to now.
Ferguson was later sacked from his position, but was very influential in swaying Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s take on Covid-19 from the herd immunity strategy to combat the Covid-19 virus.
Maavak writes that: “When enforced narratives fail, abrupt U-turns are inevitable. The global Ministry of Truth is now openly promoting the Wuhan lab leak theory when not savaging the darlings of yesteryear’s ‘coronapocalypse’.
One such fall guy is the British mathematical epidemiologist Dr. Neil Ferguson, whose Covid-19 contagion model paralleled the 3.5-hour pandemic simulation exercise called Event 201 in October 2019.
Up to 65 million people were projected to die from this contagion. Unsurprisingly, a common denominator between both projections was the omnipresent Microsoft, which helped ‘tidy up’ Ferguson’s code. Experts and politicians the world over naturally “listened to the science,” mirroring a teenager’s hysterics over another supposedly existential issue.
Now, however, shadow-banned links are emerging from Google’s search limbo to inform us that Ferguson’s code was in fact a “buggy mess” that looked “more like a bowl of angel hair pasta than a finely tuned piece of programming,” according to one data expert. This is what our endless lockdowns and coercive vaccination programs were based on.” End quote. Read the full article here.
The level of censorship in social media and search engines is all-time high. Do like thousands of others, subscribe to The Herland Report newsletter here! Led by Scandinavian bestselling author, Hanne Nabintu Herland, The Herland Report news and opinion website provides independent analysis from leading Western intellectuals and ground breaking YouTube interviews, cutting through the mainstream media rhetoric. It is a great place to watch interviews and read the articles of leading intellectuals, thought leaders, authors and activists from across the political spectrum. The Herland Report believes in freedom of speech and its editorial policy resides above the traditional Left vs Right paradigm which we believe has lost its relevance and ability to describe the current driving forces in Western politics
d’insécurités, et d’incertitudes, alors les anti-arbres croîtront suffisamment pour étouffer les « arbres de vie ». C’est-à-dire que l’apostasie commence à se répandre dans l’Église, parmi ces arbres qui ne sont pas solidement enracinés dans le terreau de l’obéissance, mais ont commencé à céder à l’esprit de compromission et de mondanité.
de la colère populaire — colère due à la décadence au sein de l’Église, à la corruption des monarques, à l’iniquité des lois et institutions — fit place au terreau de la révolution. Cela commença avec la semence des sophismes, ces mensonges et notions philosophiques et subversifs qui prirent racine dans un sol fertile. Ces semences de mondanité germèrent et s’épanouirent, d’abord sous la forme de simples paradigmes, tels que le rationalisme, le scientisme et le matérialisme, pour ensuite devenir ces anti-arbres de plus en plus imposants que sont l’athéisme, le marxisme et le communisme, dont les racines étouffèrent l’espace réservé à Dieu et à la religion.
Titre du site 