The corrupt public health officials in the Western world, who are shills for Big Pharma as they share in the profits of the drugs that they approve, are about to inflict on humanity a worst castrophe than the Covid vaccine.
They are considering using smallpox vaccine to protect against monkeypox. The New York Times, dependent as it is on pharmaceutical advertising, will support the next wave of orchestrated “health crisis” in service to vaccination profit.
Although complicit public health officials and Big Pharma will not admit it, many distinguished independent scientists have concluded that the Covid vaccine leaves the vaccinated immunocompromised.
The smallpox vaccine was always dangerous even to those with good immune systems. The result of giving smallpox vaccine to the immunocompromised could be to give them smallpox and thus reinfect the human population with a far more dangerous virus than Covid and monkeyvirus.
The reason public health is threatened is not because of Covid or monkeypox or any other illness.
Public health is endangered because public health authorities are marketing agents for pharmaceutical companies, and members of Congress are dependent on campaign contributions from Big Pharma for their reelections. Those who are supposed to be watching out for the public’s health are instead watching out for their own interests. This is why Covid with its masks, lockdowns, and untested vaccine was a catastrophe.
No one has explained why and how monkeypox, a problem in a small area of Africa, suddenly appeared all at once all over the Western world. Was the virus released in order to continue vaccination profits and to further the pandemic controls that are on the verge of being handed to the World Health Organization? See this.
Are we about to experience another fear campaign? Or is something even more evil in the works—population control by infecting the immunocompromised with smallpox?
The gullibility of Western peoples and the mendacity of their rulers is enormous. No evil is beyond the likes of a Fauci. The public has a perfect record of falling for every fear and brainwashing campaign. Are we to expect another “health crisis” in the middle of a war in Ukraine that could widen, rising food and energy prices, rising national indebtedness, open European and American borders to immigrant-invaders whose care imposes high costs on European and American populations that cannot trust their own governments and whose living standards are falling?
Smallpox vaccination ceased four decades ago when the disease was wiped out. Older generations who were vaccinated against smallpox are probably immune to monkeypox. Younger generations are not. Most at risk are those whose immune systems have been compromised by the mRNA vaccines.
Here is some good solid information with which to arm yourself against the forthcoming lies from the New York Times and the rest of the presstitutes and from the many shills for Big Pharma. Try not to be panicked a second time before we recover from the first: see Paul Alexander’s analysis:
Smallpox vaccine to prevent monkeypox could cause global smallpox (vaccinia) epidemic; I warn, do not be that stupid, understand you have damaged the immune systems of m (b)illions with COVID vaccines
Experts are saying the smallpox vax 85% effective in monkey pox; this is NOT good news, for millions/billions are now immunocompromised from COVID vax; smallpox vax, potential huge problems.
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts writes on his blog site, PCR Institute for Political Economy, where this article was originally published. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.
The original source of this article is Global Research
Now, we’re finding out the hard way how much daily life must change, and is changing, and how disorderly that process is in every way from the imperative daily life adjustments to our spiritual attitudes about them…
When I wrote The Long Emergency nearly twenty years ago, I never thought that, once it got going, our government would work so hard to make it worse. My theory then was just that government would become increasingly bloated, ineffectual, impotent, and uncomprehending of the forces converging to undermine our advanced techno-industrial societies. What I didn’t imagine was that government would bring such ostentatious stupidity to all that.
Obviously, there was some recognition that ominous changes are coming down. Otherwise, we wouldn’t have heard so much chatter about alt energy, “sustainable growth,” “green” this-and-that. But the chatter was more symptomatic of wishful thinking for at least a couple of reasons: 1) mostly it ignored the laws of physics, despite the fact that so many people involved in enterprises such as wind and solar energy were science-and-tech mavens; and 2) there was a dumb assumption that the general shape and scale of daily life would remain as it had been — in other words, that we could still run suburbia, the giant cities, Disney World, WalMart, the US military, and the Interstate highway system just the way they were already set-up, only by other means than oil and gas.
Now, we’re finding out the hard way how much daily life must change, and is changing, and how disorderly that process is in every way from the imperative personal adjustments to our spiritual attitudes about them. As with so many things in history, this disorder expresses itself strangely, even prankishly, as if God were a practical joker. Who would’ve imagined that our politics would become so deranged? That there would be battles over teaching oral sex in the fifth-grade? That the CDC would keep pushing vaccines that obviously don’t work (and that so many people would still take them)? That stealing stuff under a thousand dollars in value wouldn’t merit prosecution? That riots featuring arson and looting are “mostly peaceful?” That we’d send $50-billion halfway around the world to defend the borders of another country while ignoring the defense of our own borders? That financially beset Americans would spend their dwindling spare cash on… tattoos?
Notice that all of these strange behaviors have really nothing to do with making practical adjustments to the way we live. The collective psychology of all this is bizarre. Of course, mass formation psychosis accounts for a lot of it. Groups of people under duress, suffering from loneliness, purposelessness, helplessness, and anxiety will fall into coordinated thought-and-action if presented with some object or someone to fixate their ill feelings upon.
Donald Trump was such an object. He galvanized about half the country into an intoxicated fury aimed at destroying him. It actually managed to drive him off the scene via a fraud-laced election which many in-power (local officials, judges) deemed a means justifying the desired end. That success reinforced their mass formation psychosis. Alas, having succeeded against Mr. Trump, they were left without a galvanizing object to focus on. So, they adopted one of the devices of Trump-riddance, Covid-19, as the next object of all their distress and anxiety, adopting the mRNA vaccinations as their next savior du jour.
Unfortunately, the vaccination scheme has gone very much awry, and now millions face a future with damaged immune systems. The horror of that is too awful to comprehend, especially by government, which caused the problem in the first place and can’t possibly admit it without demolishing its legitimacy… so it presses on stupidly and heinously with the vaccine program. Already all-causes deaths are substantially up, and in time the recognition of how-and-why this happened will reach a point of criticality.
It will be too obvious to ignore. But by that time (probably not far away), the economy will be so wrecked, the people of America so deranged, and our circumstances so desperate, that the government will resort to a supremely stupid act of national suicide, say, starting a nuclear war. The government under “Joe Biden” seems perfectly disposed to that possible outcome. Which brings us to the spiritual part of the story: those unused to consorting with alleged “higher powers” might consider getting used to prayer.
Lately, a new derangement is overtaking Western Civ, for the excellent reason that Western Civ gave birth to techno industrial societies and is now first to undergo the alarming demise of that system. I speak of the World Economic Forum (under one Klaus Schwab) and its stated ambition to Build Back Better — based on its unstated premise that the current system must be nudged to its death sooner rather than later, and on-purpose. All the governments of Western Civ nations seem coordinated on this.
But it’s not going to happen as Mr. Schwab and his followers hoped, for at least a couple of reasons. First, as already stated, God is a prankster and likes to throw knuckleballs at the human race. Anyway, the “better” that Mr. Schwab expects is an ultra-techno-industrial “trans-human” scheme that is unlikely to come about if the support system of the older techno-industrial system is no longer available to support it. As currently conceived, BBB depends on electric power, and that is one of the major sub-systems of our system that already looks like it’s going janky.
You get the idea, I’m sure, so I’ll cut to the chase for now. About a year ago I had my French easel set up on a country road nearby and was busy painting a motif at-hand when along came a horse-drawn wagon filled with four men in severe black-and-white clothing, wearing beards. They were apparently a bit surprised by the strange sight of me painting a picture and they stopped to chat. They were Amish and had lately moved to the county from down in Pennsylvania, which was running out of farmland for their fruitful people. Not a half-hour later a second horse-drawn wagon passed by. I admit, the incident gave me a thrill — not just the sensory pleasure of the horses’ ripe animal smell, and the gentle rhythm of their clip-clopping along. But since I had lately been writing a bunch of novels about life in a post-economic collapse town like my own (the World Made by Hand series), I enjoyed the strange delight of being transported briefly into a scene of my own imagining — the prequel of my own books.
Many more Amish are landing in the county these days. I hear they go around to the failing or inactive farms with bundles of cash and make an offer, just like that. Evidently the method works. It’s given me a business idea: to start an Amish skills school, buy a few acres with a barn and hire some Amish men to teach all us non-Amish how to do a few things that might be good to know in the years ahead, like how to harness horses to a cart or a mule to a plow. (The Amish like to make a bit of cash-money when they can.) That’s my idea of how to build back better. What do you think?
Some people are more observant than others. Some are more capable of thinking outside the box than others. Whether this is by nature or nurture is a moot point.
When we are children, we tend to look upon the world in all its wonder. We are amazed at what exists and we absorb it like a sponge. Then, when we are in our teens, we begin our second wave of discovery. We begin to pay more attention to the things that we find confusing; we become absorbed in issues like world hunger, warfare and political strife. These situations seem senseless and we repeatedly ask, “Why should these things be?”
Typically, in our twenties, we have not yet found any solid answers and our mood turns from interest to anger. We tend to gravitate toward liberal philosophy, as liberal philosophy tells us what we would most like to hear; that these terrible things should not exist and that we should take every step available to us to end the injustices of the world – at whatever cost to ourselves and others.
Most of us continue in this approach for several years, but in our thirties we begin to recognize that, no matter how many steps are taken in this effort, the problems seem to be self-renewing and, at that point, a split occurs in philosophical outlook. Many people cease to grow at this point, as they do not want to live in a world where it is necessary to accept that suffering of one type or another is perennial. They may become increasingly stubborn in this view and, from this point on in life, tend to dig in their heels increasingly and fail to continue to grow in their understanding of the world.
However, there are others who decide that, no matter how unpleasant reality is, we will continue our pursuit of it. For those of us who do follow this (admittedly less pleasant) path, the true nature of life begins to unfold. Somewhere in our forties, it dawns on us that our thinking is no longer liberal. We may well find that our former liberal friends may treat us like traitors to the cause and we may even become pariahs to them. (Churchill said, “If you are not a liberal when you are twenty, you have no heart. If you are not a conservative when you are forty, you have no brain.” A lot of truth in that.)
Somewhere in our fifties, if we have remained diligent in our study of mankind, it all begins to gel and we begin to have a real grasp of the interrelationship of business, politics, the haves and have-nots, the whole ball of wax. We begin to recognize that there will always be those who are inspired leaders, but that there will also be those who are uninspired usurpers. There will always be those who are eager to be producers and, likewise, there will always be those who would prefer merely to consume.
From this point on in our lives, we increasingly recognize that this state of affairs is perennial, that human nature will assure that the same verve that existed to create the Roman Empire exists today, just as the same waste and decadence that destroyed it also exists today.
When I was in High School, I read George Orwell’s Animal Farm. I remember how impressed I was that he had set his novel in a farmyard and that his characters were farm animals. Orwell had consciously simplified an otherwise confusing world by boiling it down to the smallest format he could think of. In that book, when the animals gained their freedom from the “oppression” of the farmer, they were filled with high-mindedness. In order to forever remind them of what they stood for, they painted on the barn, “All animals are created equal.”
The greatest revelation of the book, for me, was when the pigs, who had become the government, altered the sign under cover of darkness to say, “All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others.” I remember thinking, “This is where the rot sets in. I must never forget this. For the rest of my life, I will need to be watching for this change in leadership approach.”
Unfortunately, it is a fact that the majority of people truly do not want to be bothered with this effort of continual reassessment of the governmental situation. In every country, in every era, the majority genuinely prefer leaders who make big promises, regardless of whether the promises will ever be delivered upon. Every country in every era has its “chicken in every pot” slogan to hang on to.
In the late eighteenth century, America became heated up over the “oppression” of King George (whose taxation, incidentally, was far lower that today’s taxes) and, eventually, openly rebelled. It has often been said by historians that, if there was a specific moment at which the move to become the United States truly began, it was when Patrick Henry stated in the House of Burgesses, “Give me Liberty or give me death.”
As we all know, the American people gained their independence and, after a fair bit of stumbling, set forth on a course of prosperity, based upon excellent natural resources and an excellent work ethic. In the middle of the nineteenth century, a war was fought, not over slavery, but over who would control the economy of the future – the northern industrialists or the southern plantation owners. The north won and the latter half of the nineteenth century saw the greatest expansion the world had ever seen. In this period, America settled the entire continent and dramatically sped up the pace of the industrial revolution. This was done without income tax or a Federal Reserve, confirming that these factors are not necessary for progress and prosperity.
Then in 1913, the pigs rewrote the sign on the barn.
A decade later, American bankers (with the support of the government) put into motion the largest scam ever to be perpetrated upon Americans. It was an unqualified success, with an unfortunate byproduct being the Great Depression. In 1999, the American bankers (again with the support of the government) put into place an almost identical scam, which has proven to be an even bigger success and (I believe) will ultimately result in an even more devastating depression.
In 1999, The Democratic US president, with the support of the Republican US Congress, repealed the Glass Steagall Act, which would allow the scam of the 1920’s to be repeated, only on a grander scale. The “pigs”, in effect, rewrote Patrick Henry’s inspiring statement. From 1999 on, the slogan has, effectively, been, “Give me liberty or give me debt,” and the governments, both democratic and republican, have encouraged and provided the latter.
On any given day, we can turn on our televisions and watch the news programs, which continually feature Republican political advisors and Democratic political advisors argue with each other over whether all the damage that has been done was done by the other side. Neither side gives an inch to the other. Americans watch this game of ping pong endlessly play out with no conclusion, yet, at election time, they must make a choice.
Most Americans today treat the two political parties the way they would treat sports teams. Just as no self-respecting sports fan would own both a Yankees and a Red Sox hat, so every American supports one political team or the other, and along the way, that support becomes so all-encompassing that there is no room for doubt. Blind conviction becomes the norm.
In 1787, Alexander Tyler, an Englishman, commented on the new US experiment as a democracy. He said, “A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.” His prediction has proven astonishingly accurate, with the last step yet to be played out.
The debt that crippled Rome two thousand years ago, and that crippled every major power since that time, is now crippling the US. Today, all Americans are aware of the problem, and almost all are hoping that, somehow, the problem will go away. It will not. In every country, in every era, it is not in the interests of the “pigs” to fix the problem. It is in their interest to allow the situation to play itself out until it ultimately crashes. Tyler was extraordinarily astute. He understood that all great powers have a shelf life. They also have a process by which they are created, then thrive, then become corrupted, then decline, then fall into ruin. This process is as perennial as the grass.
So, is this the end of the world as we know it? Yes and no. It is not the end of the world, just the end of the world as we know it. Whenever the leading power in the world falls, others are already in the wings, rising. And so it is today. Americans who are alive today have never known a situation in which their country was not the top dog in the world, and so it is hard to imagine a different world. For those who are not American and who do not reside in the US, it is easier to see a truer picture. With the collapse of the US (and Europe), there is still a very big world out there, waiting in the wings. Some second- and third-world countries are, admittedly, doing badly. However, others are getting by nicely. And still others are thriving.
Yes, there is a bright future ahead, but, sadly, not in America; at least not for many years. Those who were described in the first paragraph of this article as being more observant are already looking away from America into the future. For the first time since the eighteenth century, those who are pursuing the bright future are walking away from America, not toward it.
(LifeSiteNews) – In the coming days, the Nations that adhere to the World Health Organization (WHO) will vote on resolutions regarding the WHO’s management of pandemics. These resolutions will transfer sovereignty regarding the health of citizens to a supranational body that is largely financed by the pharmaceutical industry and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
If these resolutions are approved by a majority, the WHO will have exclusive international authority in the case of a pandemic to impose all the rules, including quarantines, lockdowns, obligatory vaccinations, and vaccine passports. It should also be borne in mind that this organization enjoys immunity, and thus its members cannot be either tried or convicted if they commit crimes. Unelected technocrats will paradoxically have more power than that which citizens confer on their representatives by means of their democratic vote. https://rumble.com/embed/v1374uw/?pub=4 Given that the yielding of sovereignty is considered the crime of high treason by the laws of every nation, and that parliaments may not legislate against the interests of the Nation, much less violate the natural liberties and fundamental rights of the citizens whom they represent, I believe that it will not escape anyone’s notice that this attempt by the WHO to appropriate a power that properly belongs to individual nations is intended to impede any sort of opposition to the “Agenda 2030,” which in the field of healthcare also aims to accomplish the drastic reduction of medical and hospital services, the privatization of the health industry, and disease prevention by means of vaccines.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Pandemic treaty empowers criminal WHO over nations
The psycho-pandemic has demonstrated the enslavement of rulers, the political system, the media, the judiciary, the entire medical industry, and even the Holy See itself to the diktats of a group of functionaries of a supranational entity that has a blatant conflict of interest. The disastrous adverse effects of the experimental mRNA serum are only now being recognized, while there are many who rightly expect that those responsible for these decisions ought to be held accountable before an independent court.
It therefore sounds absurd, to say the least, that there is now a desire to give binding decision-making power to the WHO, when in its management of the recent pandemic emergency and the vaccine campaign the greatest damage was done in terms of the number of deaths and of patients who have suffered permanent damage to their health. In addition to the impunity it enjoyed for the crimes it has committed thanks to the silence of the mainstream media, the WHO also has total discretion over how to respond to the upcoming emergencies that are obviously being planned by the pharmaceutical lobby. The marginalization of health personnel who appeal to the Hippocratic Oath risks becoming the norm by which to eliminate every voice of dissent.
In this regard, it is significant that the Nations that oppose the New World Order – like Russia and Brazil – are aware of the very serious consequences that the ratification of these resolutions would entail, and for this reason they are opposed to their approval. During his term of office, President Donald Trump also sent an unequivocal signal by halting funding from the U.S. Treasury to the WHO. This was one of the reasons why the deep state blocked his re-election in 2020, supporting a compromised and corrupt individual whose son Hunter is involved in financing American biolabs in Ukraine.
I therefore express my full support for the citizens – especially scientists, doctors, and legal experts – who are denouncing this threat to the national sovereignty of the adhering Nations, and who are asking for light to be shed on past events and on the consequences that the decisions of the WHO have caused for the health of the world population. I exhort heads of state and government leaders who will be called to express their views about the ratification of these resolutions to reject them, since they are contrary to the common good and intended to carry out the global coup that the WHO and the World Economic Forum (WEF) have planned for years under the names of the “Agenda 2030” and the “Great Reset.”
Global health governance is one of the fundamental elements of the New World Order, as has been made clear by authoritative experts who are not compromised with the system, and as such it must be rejected and opposed. The logic of control, profit, and mass pathologization must be replaced with a public health policy that has as its primary goal the health of citizens and the protection of their inalienable rights.
Holy See must reaffirm rights, protect the defenseless
The Holy See – which is a Permanent Observer at the United Nations and also at the WHO for one year now – has the duty to reaffirm the right of individuals to accept or refuse health treatments, especially in the face of the concrete danger of adverse effects, which are still partly unknown, from this experimental genetic treatment. And if up until now Bergoglio and his cabal have indulged the delusions of Gates, Schwab, and Soros, the time has come for the Catholic Church to defend the weakest, the defenseless unborn, children, and the elderly, as well as those who have been blackmailed by the cynicism of businessmen and conspirators in order to force them to be inoculated with a serum contaminated by aborted fetal cell lines.
The present conspiratorial silence of the Vatican, after the hasty pronouncements it made at the beginning of the pandemic and its shameful endorsements of Big Pharma, will be imputed to the condemnation of the Roman Sanhedrin, which has made itself an accomplice in a crime against God and man. Never in all of history has the Hierarchy prostituted itself to temporal power in such a servile and abject way. Let us pray that some Bishops will find the courage to distance themselves from Bergoglio’s collaborationist line and find the words to open the eyes of those good people who have thus far been deceived by globalist propaganda.
subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada Catholic
Specifically, are you a gay man who likes sex with lots of other gay men? Maybe in a bathhouse? Maybe names optional? Maybe with a meth bump on the side?
No? Are you sure?
It’s cool if you are, no judgments. They’re called glory holes for a reason, people!
Okay. Don’t worry about the monkeypox thing then.
You can almost feel the public health authorities squirming right now.
On the one hand, they’ve almost got another epidemic on the go – the perfect way to distract the shiny-haired robots in the media from the complete failure of the mRNA vaccines.
On the other, the monkeypox epidemic – stop me if you’ve heard this before – very much appears to be centered around the sexual practices of gay men. (And bisexual men, also known as gay men who want to pretend they’re straight.)
In this, monkeypox joins not just HIV, but syphilis, gonorrhea, and a bunch of other nasties. The state of California – that hyper-conservative hotspot – reports that gay men are hundreds of times more likely to get syphilis than straight men or women.
And if you want, you can go full Ding and start screaming that the virus has mutated in some completely unexpected way and is going to KILL US ALL! (Orthopox viruses mutate very slowly by viral standards, by the way, which is why the smallpox vaccine works so well.)
Or you can go full Alex Jones and start screaming about how the DNA/AAV Covid vaccines are giving us monkeypox! (Do you know what happens to my blood pressure when woke morons on Twitter compare me to Alex #@$%TG$ Jones? If I stroke out, you’ll know why.)
Or you can accept the reality that this epidemic probably came out of a couple of gay raves.
The good news is that the public health authorities are now likely to pivot fast away from trying to scare people about monkeypox, for fear of stigmatizing gay men (by letting them know too much about what happens at these raves). As always, the Onion captured the reality better than any “real” news organization ever could:
Added bonus: the same epidemiologists who wanted to lock you and your kids up for the last two years for Covid, a disease that poses approximately no risk to them, are now sure to let you know that MANDATES AND GOVERNMENT EFFORTS TO CHANGE BEHAVIOR NEVER WORK!
Yep, without Chinese labs and gay bathhouses, epidemiologists these days wouldn’t have much to do.
Last week, President Biden signed a massive $40 billion military aid bill for Ukraine. Who cares that inflation is killing the American economy and mothers can’t even get baby formula. For Washington, spending on war and empire always seems to trump America’s interests.
To put this giveaway to Ukraine in perspective: just since late February, the US has provided nearly $60 billion in “assistance” to Ukraine. That is almost half that country’s entire 2020 GDP! Washington has literally adopted Ukraine in our name and on our dime.
The Biden Administration claims that Ukraine is winning the war with Russia and that such an expenditure to protect Ukraine’s borders is critical to our national interests and worth risking a nuclear war over.
But protecting Ukraine’s democracy is no longer the stated goal of the Administration. Defense Secretary Austin outlined the Administration’s new intention not long ago when he said that the real goal is to weaken Russia.
Biden’s neocons are fighting a war with Russia, but once again Congress has no interest in voting on a war declaration or even in debating whether war with Russia 30 years after the end of the Cold War is a good idea.
There is a reason our Constitution grants war powers to the legislative branch. Forcing Members of the House and Senate to declare the US to be in a state of war also enables them – through the powers of the purse-string – to define the goals of the war and particularly what a victory looks like. That prevents the kind of mission-creep ahd shifting objectives that have characterized our endless wars in the 21st century – including this current proxy war with Russia.
Even the US mainstream media is beginning to notice. Last week the New York Times’ Editorial Board published an editorial originally titled, “What is America’s Strategy in Ukraine?” complaining that the Biden Administration has yet to answer any questions to the American people regarding its involvement in Ukraine.
While, as could be expected, the paper attacked the “isolationists” in the US Congress who opposed the $40 billion giveaway, the NY Times editorial board nevertheless registered what can only be seen as the first major sign of dissent among the usual media war cheerleaders.
…it is still not in America’s best interest to plunge into an all-out war with Russia, even if a negotiated peace may require Ukraine to make some hard decisions. And the US aims and strategy in this war have become harder to discern, as the parameters of the mission appear to have changed.
While warning that Americans’ interest in Ukraine will begin to wane without more clarity from Washington as to its goals, the paper went on to directly contradict the Biden Administration’s predictions of a Ukraine victory:
A decisive military victory for Ukraine over Russia, in which Ukraine regains all the territory Russia has seized since 2014, is not a realistic goal.
Congress – with very few exceptions – has opened a financial spigot to the government in Kiev without asking a single question about how and why the money is to be spent. When Senator Paul simply asked for someone to keep track of the $60 billion we shipped over there he was met with near-unanimous opposition.
An endless supply of US taxpayer money to Ukraine with zero stated goals and zero oversight. Isn’t it time to stand up and demand that both parties in Congress start asking some hard questions?
Dans l’univers comme dans l’histoire, la création, la destruction et la conservation sont à l’oeuvre. C’est vrai à l’échelle cosmique comme à celle de la vie, de l’économie et de la politique. Les politiques ont rarement le recul et les connaissances nécessaires pour comprendre ce processus et pour tenter de le maîtriser dans la limite de leurs moyens et dans le but d’assurer le bien commun des peuples qu’ils ont en charge. Tel veut le progrès avec furie qui fonce tête baissée vers la décadence. Tel veut la suprématie de sa nation qu’il la précipite dans le plus profond abaissement. Tel veut que rien ne bouge jusqu’à ce que tout s’effondre. Ces excès propres aux dictatures sont étrangers aux démocraties où la pluralité des décideurs et le court terme des échéances électorales empêchent le plus souvent la moindre hauteur de vue. Les plus grands hommes politiques sont ceux qui surmontent ce handicap. Ce sont les conservateurs intelligents qui luttent pour la survie de leur nation, comme des commandants de vaisseaux, en n’affrontant pas les vents contraires, mais en sauvant le navire quitte à louvoyer non sans le délester de quelque bagage trop lourd. Les exemples de ces hommes remontent à la seconde guerre mondiale : Churchill et De Gaulle.
Il y a des forces qui entraînent les hommes vers leur destinée. Lorsqu’on dit que l’histoire est tragique, ce n’est pas seulement pour rappeler que la violence et la guerre y sont chez elles, mais pour souligner que les hommes font l’histoire en la subissant plus qu’en la dirigeant. Henri Guaino pointait cette évidence récemment dans un parallèle entre la marche vers la première guerre mondiale et la situation actuelle créée en Ukraine. Les acteurs du drame voient bien leurs objectifs, mais n’ont pas conscience des conséquences de ce qu’ils veulent, du croisement fatal de ces objectifs. C’est la raison pour laquelle, il est vital qu’à ces moments cruciaux, le pouvoir soit donné à des hommes dotés de la hauteur de vue nécessaire et de la claire conscience de leur mission : assurer le bien commun de leur peuple.
Malheureusement pour notre pays, le dernier président à avoir eu quelques lueurs dans ce domaine, malgré bien des déficiences, était Chirac. Son refus de soutenir les Etats-Unis dans leur aventure irakienne a été la dernière décision intelligente de la politique internationale de notre pays. Depuis, ses trois successeurs ont sombré dans un atlantisme servile. Ils ont fait rentrer la France dans le rang des nations médiocres comme le sont devenus les autres peuples européens, avec une oligarchie bruxelloise qui est le relais du suzerain américain et leur transmet ses directives, le plus souvent au travers des organismes internationaux qu’il contrôle. Il ne faut pas chercher de “chef d’orchestre” là où il y a seulement une addition confuse d’intérêts, de visions du futur, d’objectifs stratégiques et d’idéologie aussi inconsciente que conquérante. Cette idéologie et ces intérêts ne sont pas ceux du monde, mais seulement ceux d’un Occident qui décline. Les autres civilisations s’en libèrent, et un homme politique sérieux devrait en être conscient.
Le grand paradoxe qui préside aux choix politiques des Français est de confier leur avenir à une caste qui les rassure par ses diplômes et ses concours alors qu’elle devrait les effrayer par le poids de ses erreurs, de ses fautes, de ses échecs dans pratiquement tous les domaines où elle sévit. Là où il faudrait un habile manoeuvrier capable de se dégager du troupeau, on a au contraire le pire des suiveurs qui aspire seulement à être en tête du groupe pour mener plus vite et dans l’enthousiasme sa charge vers le ravin. Le vent est puissant qui pousse dans cette direction : il a la force de l’oligarchie occidentale, de sa puissance financière et politique, de ses relais médiatiques, et de l’idéologie dominante secrétée dans notre formation dite supérieure, singulièrement là où on enseigne les sciences molles. La nomination comme ministre de l’Education nationale de Pap Ndiaye, est un symbole de taille : sans la moindre expérience des arcanes du ministère très lourd dont il hérite, il est avant tout un universitaire spécialiste de la société américaine, de ses minorités, de ses ségrégations, et très compréhensif à l’égard du “wokisme”, bref un accélérateur de la diffusion en France d’un modèle américain inapproprié à notre histoire et d’une idéologie mortifère pour notre pays.
Cette provocation vise bien sûr le peuple français que le président réélu a l’habitude d’accabler de son mépris. Pourquoi se gênerait-il, puisque la brave bourgeoisie mêlant bobos et retraités l’a réélu ? Mais elle se situe dans une démarche que les grands médias se garderont bien de dénoncer puisqu’ils en sont les complices : la peur de l’extrême-droite, Zemmour au premier tour, qui n’a rien fait pour l’éviter, Marine Le Pen au second, a assuré la réélection dans le brouillard des peurs entre Covid et Ukraine. Une fois la droite explosée et repue de ses lambeaux, les législatives seront un terrain réservé à la gauche, dans un jeu pervers de séduction-répulsion. C’est désormais l’extrême-gauche qui sèmera une frayeur salutaire dans les isoloirs, mais ce sont ses thèmes qui seront au centre des débats. La droite sociologique préférera Macron à Mélenchon d’autant plus facilement que les carriéristes ralliés se seront multipliés. Mais les questions seront : jusqu’où l’immigration et le changement bénéfique de peuple ? Jusqu’où l’Europe et la dilution de la France ? Le pouvoir d’achat, la peur climatique, la prétendue menace russe, et peut-être le retour de l’épidémie distrairont les Français des questions superflues comme de savoir si notre pays, sa langue, sa culture ont un avenir. La montée de la violence sera considérée comme un phénomène que l’Etat ne peut guère maîtriser, contrairement au climat, cela va sans dire.
Durant cinq ans, et même davantage, puisque Macron est entré à l’Elysée avec Hollande, le président réélu n’a apporté aucun remède aux problèmes des Français. Il faut lire ” Le vrai Etat de la France” d’Agnès Verdier-Molinié pour mesurer la mystification mise en oeuvre afin de donner l’illusion d’une amélioration de notre économie. Elle n’est que le signe apparent d’une accentuation de la politique de gauche menée depuis des décennies en France, animée par la démagogie du “toujours plus”, rendue momentanément possible par la planche à billets de l’endettement. Cette accélération au nom du “quoi qu’il en coûte” produit ses résultats calamiteux, hausse des prix, inflation, montée des taux d’intérêts dont l’effet de ciseaux sera douloureux. Cela s’ajoutera au sentiment confus que la “bienpensance” aura contenu, voire culpabilisé : celui du déclassement, du déclin et de la décadence de notre pays. Le réveil de la nation pourra alors être violent, à moins que les Français n’aient décidément choisi le sommeil, et ne veuillent ignorer, à tout prix, la supercherie dont ils sont les victimes. (Fin)
WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) — The U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday passed a sweeping new bill to expand the federal government’s ability to spy on Americans in the alleged effort to combat “domestic terrorism.”
H.R. 350, or the “Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act,” was passed in a 222-203 vote almost entirely along party lines, with all House Democrats and just one House Republican, Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, voting to approve the measure.
The Hill reported the legislative proposal would create “domestic terrorism offices within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI that would be tasked with monitoring and scrutinizing potential terror activity,” specifically emphasizing terror activity motivated by “white supremacist” or “neo-Nazi” sentiments.
Democrats have largely promoted the bill as a response to the horrific mass shooting perpetrated by an avowed “white supremacist” gunman (who also claimed to be in the “mild-moderate-authoritarian Left category”) at a Buffalo, New York, grocery store last week.
However, Republicans have blasted the measure for giving the federal government far too much police power.
According to Texas Republican Rep. Chip Roy, the bill constitutes the “empowerment of the federal bureaucracy to target Americans.”
“This is nothing more than empowering the federal government to police thought and speech in the United States of America, and we should oppose it roundly,” he added.
The bill has also been slammed for narrowing the definition of domestic terrorism to focus on “white supremacist” attacks, at a time when mainstream conservative perspectives on matters ranging from immigration law to Critical Race Theory are often baselessly assigned the “white supremacy” label.
In a May 19 editorial, National Reviewargued that “the Democrats’ proposal would actually create indefensible exceptions in terrorism law,” going so far as to shield radical Islamic jihadists from the reach of federal law.
“It would narrow the scope of terrorist activity that existing statutes can reach — for the blatantly political purpose of labeling white supremacism, alone, as the nation’s urgent domestic security challenge,” the editors added, noting that investigative resources will be arbitrarily diverted toward alleged “white supremacy” instead of other potential sources of domestic terrorism.
subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada Catholic
“Democrats would then, we can be sure, demagogue conservative policy preferences — e.g., Second Amendment rights, free expression, opposition to progressive indoctrination in the schools and other institutions — as catalysts of white supremacism that must be monitored by the Justice Department,” National Review suggested.
“As we learned from 20th-century domestic-spying scandals, loose legal standards invite the government to invoke ‘domestic terrorism’ as a pretextual rationale for surveillance of the opposition,” the outlet added.
Federal lawmakers aren’t the only ones looking to capitalize on the horrific massacre in New York to expand the reach of government bureaucracy.
New York’s Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul on Wednesday announced she will form a special police unit which will, among other things, work to fight the so-called “epidemic” of “hate speech” in response to the mass shooting in Buffalo, which was at least partially inspired by radical rhetoric on the internet.
“We’re proposing a comprehensive plan to combat domestic terrorism, strengthen state gun laws, & investigate social media platforms promoting violent extremism,” Hochul said in a Wednesday tweet.
“In wake of the racist act of terror in Buffalo, New York will lead the charge to confront this epidemic head-on,” she added.
Democrat lawmakers and legacy media outlets have emphasized the Buffalo shooter’s alleged adherence to the notion of “replacement theory,” which suggests that leftist elites are promoting widespread immigration to “replace” the White majority of the U.S.
Some conservatives, meanwhile, have pointed out that some of the most prolific purveyors of the alleged “conspiracy theory” have been left-wing pundits and media figures themselves, who have often celebrated the notion that minorities will soon replace Whites as the majority population in America.
As with the Event 201, the participants at the Monkeypox simulation have thus far been stone silent as to their having participated in a pandemic simulation the facts of which happened to come true in real life just months later.
STOP THE WHO POWER-GRAB! Contact the Permanent Mission of the U.S. to the U.N. in Geneva TODAY.
(Brownstone Institute) – Elite media outlets around the world are on red alert over the world’s first-ever global outbreak of Monkeypox in mid-May 2022—just one year after an international biosecurity conference in Munich held a simulation of a “global pandemic involving an unusual strain of Monkeypox” beginning in mid-May 2022.
Monkeypox was first identified in 1958, but there’s never been a global Monkeypox outbreak outside of Africa until now—in the exact week of the exact month predicted by the biosecurity folks in their pandemic simulation. Take these guys to Vegas!
Epidemiologists Jennifer Nuzzo and Bill Hanage are on the scene—but still no word from them as to whether they see anything strange about the first-ever global Monkeypox outbreak occurring in mid-May 2022, a year after they acted as advisers on an international biosecurity simulation of a global Monkeypox outbreak occurring in mid-May 2022.
The US Government is hot on the scene with an order of 13 million Monkeypox vaccine doses from Bavarian Nordic.
The World Health Organization is on the scene.
subscribe to our daily headlines US Canada Catholic
The global Monkeypox outbreak—occurring on the exact timeline predicted by a biosecurity simulation of a global Monkeypox outbreak a year prior—bears a striking resemblance to the outbreak of COVID-19 just months after Event 201, a simulation of a coronavirus pandemic almost exactly like COVID-19.
Event 201 was hosted in October 2019—just two months before the coronavirus was first revealed in Wuhan—by the Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum, Bloomberg, and Johns Hopkins. As with the Event 201, the participants at the Monkeypox simulation have thus far been stone silent as to their having participated in a pandemic simulation the facts of which happened to come true in real life just months later.
— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Stop Tedros’ WHO Pandemic Treaty
82932 have signed the petition.
Let’s get to 90000!
Add your signature:
Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
One person who was present at both Event 201 and the Monkeypox simulation is George Fu Gao, director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control. At Event 201, Gao specifically raised the point of countering “misinformation” during a “hypothetical” coronavirus pandemic.
Here’s Gao at Event 201 right next to our very own Avril Haines, Director of National Intelligence—technically the highest-level intelligence official in the United States. Look at these cuties. Doesn’t that make you feel all warm and fuzzy? Phew. Making Kim Philby jealous.
That said, I won’t sit here and debate wild conspiracy theories that there might be anything unusual about a global pandemic occurring just months after a simulation of a global pandemic of exactly that kind, followed shortly after by the first-ever global outbreak of an even-more-obscure virus just months after a simulation of an outbreak of exactly that kind.
If you want to be a good American and make a six-figure salary—or be friends with people who make six-figure salaries—then do as your government tells you: Sit down, shut up, stay home, save lives, take your shots, show your papers, and muzzle your kids.
La vie des enfants à naître compte (via CitizenGO)
Une fuite de Politico suggère que la Cour suprême va renverser Roe Vs Wade. Mais…Nous ne pouvons pas être aussi naïfs pour croire que cette bataille est déjà gagnée ! C’est ce que la gauche veut nous faire croire pour que nous restions à la maison pendant qu’elle prépare une énorme mobilisation pour faire basculer la décision de la Cour suprême.C’est le moment le plus terrifiant pour la gauche. Elle est maintenant confrontée à la plus grande victoire pro-vie de l’histoire des États-Unis depuis l’adoption de Roe vs. Wade en 1973. Nous ne les laisserons pas gagner. Les vies des bébés dans l’utérus comptent sur nous maintenant. CitizenGO et des millions de personnes dans le monde agissent maintenant pour envoyer une pétition directement aux juges de la Cour suprême eux-mêmes. Il ne tient qu’à vous d’être une voix pour les sans-voix ! Avec un soutien suffisant, nous serons en mesure d’être une voix qui éclipse celle de la gauche. Avec cette pétition, nous serons en mesure de détruire leur tentative de maintenir Roe vs. Wade. Signez maintenant pour faire entendre votre voix personnelle aux juges de la Cour suprême des États-Unis d’Amérique.Et priez pour que les juges de la Cour suprême prennent la meilleure décision. Merci pour tout ce que vous faites, Alexandre, Owen, Gregory, Ignacio et le reste de l’équipe. P.S. Si vous avez déjà signé la pétition, merci de partager la pétition à vos amis. Ici, mon mail original Pour la première fois dans l’histoire, les États-Unis ont la possibilité de passer outre Roe Vs Wade et de faire de l’avortement une question fédérale, ce qui permettrait de sauver des millions d’enfants à naître. Nous sommes sur le point d’assister à l’une des plus grandes victoires du mouvement pro-vie. S’il n’existe plus de droit national à l’avortement, le nombre de bébés à naître tués chaque année diminuera à mesure que de plus en plus d’États adopteront une législation pro-vie. Le soutien aux pro-vie n’a jamais été aussi élevé, et il est temps de montrer aux responsables de notre gouvernement que nous rejetons le mal de l’avortement. C’est pourquoi il est absolument essentiel que nous agissions maintenant pour nous assurer que la Cour sache que de nombreux citoyens américains et du monde, rejettent Roe vs Wade, et que l’arrêt doit être annulé. SIGNEZ LA PÉTITION Bonjour Olivier, Le moment est venu. Le moment est arrivé. Pour la première fois dans l’histoire, les États-Unis ont la possibilité de passer outre Roe Vs Wade et de faire de l’avortement une question fédérale, ce qui permettrait de sauver des millions d’enfants à naître. La Cour suprême se prononce actuellement sur le verdict d’une affaire appelée Dobbs vs Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Cette affaire remet en question le fait que les États puissent ou non restreindre l’avortement après 15 semaines de grossesse. Nous avons la chance d’avoir plusieurs juges conservateurs à la Cour suprême, mais il n’est pas certain qu’ils invalideront Roe vs Wade. C’est pourquoi il est absolument essentiel que nous agissions maintenant pour nous assurer que la Cour sache que de nombreux citoyens américains et du monde, rejettent Roe vs Wade, et que l’arrêt doit être annulé. Vous avez maintenant l’occasion de signer cette pétition et de marquer l’histoire de votre pays en contribuant à l’annulation de Roe Vs WadeEt s’il vous plaît, priez pour que les juges de la Cour suprême prennent la meilleure décision.Nous sommes sur le point d’assister à l’une des plus grandes victoires du mouvement pro-vie. S’il n’existe plus de droit national à l’avortement, le nombre de bébés à naître tués chaque année diminuera à mesure que de plus en plus d’États adopteront une législation pro-vie.Le soutien aux pro-vie n’a jamais été aussi élevé, et il est temps de montrer aux responsables de notre gouvernement que nous rejetons le mal de l’avortement. Alors que nous sommes démobilisés, les défenseurs de l’avortement sont en panique et se mobilisent pour tenter de préserver l’avortement. Leurs alliés médiatiques et les tentacules d’Open Democracy (George Soros) et de la société Planned Parenthood préparent une réaction brutale pour sauver leur volonté de tuer de nombreux enfants à naître. Vous pouvez contribuer à les arrêter. Je vous demande de faire deux choses de manière urgente :Signez cette pétition qui sera remise directement aux juges de la Cour suprême, pour les convaincre de mettre fin à Roe Vs WadePriez pour que les juges de la Cour suprême prennent la meilleure décision.Depuis la décision de Roe Vs Wade en 1973, plus de 62 millions d’enfants innocents ont été massacrés aux États-Unis. Ces enfants ne connaîtront jamais la chaleur du soleil, l’amour de leur famille et de leurs amis. La Déclaration d’indépendance énonce les droits inaliénables à la vie, à la liberté et à la recherche du bonheur. L’avortement prive les plus innocents d’entre nous du droit fondamental à la vie. Roe Vs Wade s’oppose à la nature même et à la conception des États-Unis et de nombreux pays du monde.Les juges de la Cour Suprême doivent savoir qu’il y a une majorité pour la vie et non pour la mort. Voici l’occasion de le leur faire savoir personnellement. C’est l’une des pétitions les plus importantes pour la vie et qui aura des répercussions en France et dans toute l’Europe.Signez ici pour sauver les innocents à naître, et mettre fin à Roe vs. Wade pour toujours. Merci pour votre engagement, Alexandre, Owen, Gregory, Ignacio et le reste de l’équipe. — Pour plus d’informations:États-Unis: le droit à l’IVG menacé par la Cour suprêmehttps://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/avortement-la-cour-supreme-americaine-tentee-de-revenir-sur-l-arret-roe-vs-wade-20220503